The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study of the collision‐induced radical cleavage of flavonoid glycosides using negative electrospray ionization tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry
Abstract
Negative electrospray ionization tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry was used to study the collision‐induced dissociation (CID) of the O‐glycosidic bond from different commercially available flavonoid glycosides. Depending on the structure, flavonoid glycosides can undergo both a collision‐induced homolytic and heterolytic cleavage of the O‐glycosidic bond producing deprotonated radical aglycone ((Y 0 − H)−·) and aglycone (Y 0−) product ions. The relative abundance of the radical aglycone to the aglycone fragment from flavonol‐3‐O‐glycosides increased with increasing number of hydroxyl substituents in the B ring and in the order kaempferol − <quercetin − <myricetin‐3‐O‐glycoside. The nature and position of the sugar substitution of the flavonol glycosides also affected the fragmentation to the radical aglycone. Obtained under similar conditions, the product ion spectrum of kaempferol‐7‐O‐neohesperidoside showed only a minor radical aglycone product ion as opposed to kaempferol‐3‐O‐rutinoside. The relative abundance of the radical aglycone to the aglycone fragment from flavone‐7‐O‐glycosides was also dependent on the substitution in the B ring. CID of apigenin‐7‐O‐glucoside produced relatively more of the radical aglycone fragment than luteolin‐7‐O‐glucoside, while only the aglycone fragment was found from diosmetin‐7‐O‐rutinoside. The position of the sugar substitution also affected the fragmentation of the flavone glycosides, such that the product ion spectrum of luteolin‐4′‐O‐glucoside showed only the aglycone fragment as opposed to luteolin‐7‐O‐glucoside. No radical aglycone fragments were found from the flavanone‐7‐O‐glycosides and dihydrochalcone glycoside investigated in the study. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance
Bravo, L. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x · Cited by 4,030
Cited by
Lai, J.-P., Lim, Y. H., Su, J., Shen, H.-M., & Ong, C. N. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.028 · Cited by 189
van der Hooft, J. J. J., Vervoort, J., Bino, R. J., Beekwilder, J., & de Vos, R. C. H. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac102546x · Cited by 99
Pacifico, S., Galasso, S., Piccolella, S., Kretschmer, N., Pan, S.-P., Marciano, S., Bauer, R., & Monaco, P. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.019 · Cited by 86
Faugno, S., Piccolella, S., Sannino, M., Principio, L., Crescente, G., Baldi, G. M., Fiorentino, N., & Pacifico, S. (2019) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.084 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Hvattum, E., & Ekeberg, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-13
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W1980502026
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.