Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein

Open access
Kumar, Suresh, Thambiraja, Thiviya S., Karuppanan, Kalimuthu, Subramaniam, Gunasekaran·2022·Journal of Medical Virology

Abstract

Emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants, especially those of concern, may have an impact on the virus's transmissibility and pathogenicity, as well as diagnostic equipment performance and vaccine effectiveness. Even though the SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) emerged during India's second wave of infections, Delta variants have grown dominant internationally and are still evolving. On November 26, 2021, World Health Organization identified the variant B.1.1.529 as a variant of concern, naming it Omicron, based on evidence that Omicron contains numerous mutations that may influence its behavior. However, the mode of transmission and severity of the Omicron variant remains unknown. We used computational studies to examine the Delta and Omicron variants in this study and found that the Omicron variant had a higher affinity for human angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) than the Delta variant due to a significant number of mutations in the SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor‐binding domain (RBD), indicating a higher potential for transmission. Based on docking studies, the Q493R, N501Y, S371L, S373P, S375F, Q498R, and T478K mutations contribute significantly to high binding affinity with human ACE2. In comparison to the Delta variant, both the entire spike protein and the RBD in Omicron include a high proportion of hydrophobic amino acids such as leucine and phenylalanine. These amino acids are located within the protein's core and are required for structural stability. We observed a disorder–order transition in the Omicron variant between spike protein RBD regions 468–473, and it may be significant in the influence of disordered residues/regions on spike protein stability and binding to ACE2. A future study might investigate the epidemiological and biological consequences of the Omicron variant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmv.27526

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Thambiraja, T. S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G.
Venue
Journal of Medical Virology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-27
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
1641-1649
ISSN
  • 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9071
OpenAlex
W4200180765
Cited by
579
References
33
FWCI
38.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmv.27526
The paper
Kumar, S., Thambiraja, T. S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G. (2022). Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein. Journal of Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27526

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.