The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein
Open accessAbstract
Emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants, especially those of concern, may have an impact on the virus's transmissibility and pathogenicity, as well as diagnostic equipment performance and vaccine effectiveness. Even though the SARS‐CoV‐2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) emerged during India's second wave of infections, Delta variants have grown dominant internationally and are still evolving. On November 26, 2021, World Health Organization identified the variant B.1.1.529 as a variant of concern, naming it Omicron, based on evidence that Omicron contains numerous mutations that may influence its behavior. However, the mode of transmission and severity of the Omicron variant remains unknown. We used computational studies to examine the Delta and Omicron variants in this study and found that the Omicron variant had a higher affinity for human angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) than the Delta variant due to a significant number of mutations in the SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor‐binding domain (RBD), indicating a higher potential for transmission. Based on docking studies, the Q493R, N501Y, S371L, S373P, S375F, Q498R, and T478K mutations contribute significantly to high binding affinity with human ACE2. In comparison to the Delta variant, both the entire spike protein and the RBD in Omicron include a high proportion of hydrophobic amino acids such as leucine and phenylalanine. These amino acids are located within the protein's core and are required for structural stability. We observed a disorder–order transition in the Omicron variant between spike protein RBD regions 468–473, and it may be significant in the influence of disordered residues/regions on spike protein stability and binding to ACE2. A future study might investigate the epidemiological and biological consequences of the Omicron variant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure, function and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein
Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., McGuire, A. T., & Veesler, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.19.956581 · Cited by 8,586
UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
The UniProt Consortium (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049 · Cited by 7,698
SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function
Ng, P. C. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg509 · Cited by 6,577
Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor
Lan, J., Ge, J., Yu, J., Shan, S., Zhou, H., Fan, S., Zhang, Q., Shi, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5 · Cited by 5,983
ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis
Gasteiger, E. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg563 · Cited by 5,595
GISAID: Global initiative on sharing all influenza data – from vision to reality
Shu, Y., & McCauley, J. (2017) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.13.30494 · Cited by 3,039
I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure
Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki375 · Cited by 2,052
Clustal Omega, Accurate Alignment of Very Large Numbers of Sequences
Sievers, F., & Higgins, D. G. (2014) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_6 · Cited by 1,247
PONDR-FIT: A meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids
Xue, B., Dunbrack, R. L., Williams, R. W., Dunker, A. K., & Uversky, V. N. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.01.011 · Cited by 1,223
Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses
Leung, N. H. L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00535-6 · Cited by 890
Cited by
Araf, Y., Akter, F., Tang, Y., Fatemi, R., Parvez, M. S. A., Zheng, C., & Hossain, M. G. (2022) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.27588 · Cited by 862
Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Stein, C., Nassereldine, H., Sorensen, R. J. D., Amlag, J. O., Bisignano, C., Byrne, S., Castro, E., Coberly, K., Collins, J. K., Dalos, J., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02465-5 · Cited by 412
Kumar, S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.11.480029 · Cited by 223
Self-citationBarh, D., Tiwari, S., Rodrigues Gomes, L. G., Ramalho Pinto, C. H., Andrade, B. S., Ahmad, S., Aljabali, A. A. A., Alzahrani, K. J., Banjer, H. J., Hassan, S. S., et al. (2023) · Inflammation · doi:10.1007/s10753-022-01734-w · Cited by 50
Palmer, C. D., Scallan, C. D., Kraemer Tardif, L. D., Kachura, M. A., Rappaport, A. R., Koralek, D. O., Uriel, A., Gitlin, L., Klein, J., Davis, M. J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39053-9 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S., Thambiraja, T. S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-12-27
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1641-1649
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9071
- OpenAlex
- W4200180765
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 38.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmv.27526
- The paper
- Kumar, S., Thambiraja, T. S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G. (2022). Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike protein. Journal of Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27526
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.