Cited by 39Fatty Acid Research and HealthRetinal Development and DisordersLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Preferential uptake and metabolism of docosahexaenoic acid in membrane phospholipids from rod and cone photoreceptor cells of human and monkey retinas

de Turco, E. B. Rodriguez, Gordon, W. C., Peyman, G. A., Bazan, N. G.·1990·Journal of Neuroscience Research

Abstract

The uptake, metabolism, and cellular distribution of [3H]docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in human and monkey retinas were studied with biochemical and autoradiographic techniques. In specimens from two human retina biopsies, incubated for 4 hr or 6 hr with [3H]docosahexaenoic acid (110 nM), 80% of the esterified [3H]fatty acid was recovered in phospholipids and the remainder in triacylglycerols and diacylglycerols. The distribution of [3H]DHA in individual phospholipids (PL) was similar in both retinas, with phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) accounting for most of the label. A similar labeling profile was observed in glycerolipids from monkey retina, and after 1 hr of incubation, high labeling of phosphatidic acid (PA, 11%) and phosphatidylinositol (PI, 20%) was observed. In both human and monkey retinas, a preferential uptake of [3H]DHA by photoreceptor cells was revealed by autoradiography. Cone photoreceptors showed a slightly higher density of silver grains in their inner segments than did rod photoreceptors. Photoreceptors accounted for 59% and 79% of the total [3H]DHA taken up by the human and monkey retinas, respectively, the remainder being distributed throughout the neural retina. In conclusion, this study shows for the first time that in human and monkey retinas, DHA is taken up with a high degree of selectivity by photoreceptor cells, and then becomes esterified mainly into phospholipids that will be subsequently utilized for the synthesis of new disc membranes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jnr.490270413

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Turco, E. B. R., Gordon, W. C., Peyman, G. A., & Bazan, N. G.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bazan, N. G.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-12
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
522-532
ISSN
  • 0360-4012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4547
OpenAlex
W1997858872
Cited by
39
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey004428-07, 5r01ey007541-02)
  • National Eye Institute (EY-02377, EY04428, P30EY002377, EY07541)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, photoreceptors, rod photoreceptors, cone photoreceptors, fatty acid uptake, fatty acid esterification, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid, triglycerides, diacylglycerol, human retina, monkey retina
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Autoradiography, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Female, Humans, Male, Membranes, Middle Aged, Phospholipids, Photoreceptor Cells, Rana pipiens, Retina, Saimiri, Species Specificity, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review