Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 777

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude

Bissing‐Olson, Megan J., Iyer, Aarti, Fielding, Kelly S., Zacher, Hannes·2013·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Summary: Research in organizational psychology has increasingly focused on understanding the determinants of “green” employee behavior. The present study used a daily diary design to investigate relationships between employees' daily affect, pro‐environmental attitude, as well as daily task‐related pro‐environmental behavior (i.e., the extent to which employees complete required work tasks in environmentally friendly ways), and daily proactive pro‐environmental behavior (i.e., the extent to which employees show personal initiative when acting in environmentally friendly ways at work). Fifty‐six employees working in small businesses completed a baseline survey and two daily surveys over ten workdays. Daily unactivated positive affect and pro‐environmental attitude positively predicted daily task‐related pro‐environmental behavior. In addition, daily activated positive affect positively predicted daily proactive pro‐environmental behavior among employees with a less positive pro‐environmental attitude but not among employees with a more positive pro‐environmental attitude. These findings suggest that fostering pro‐environmental attitudes and, to some extent, positive affect among employees could help organizations to promote pro‐environmental behavior in the workplace. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.1788

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 777

Metadata

Authors
Bissing‐Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-20
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
156-175
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W1914085835
Cited by
777
References
15
FWCI
32.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/job.1788
The paper
Bissing‐Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.