Cited by 148Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Equity sensitivity and outcome importance

Open access
Miles, Edward W., Hatfield, John D., Huseman, Richard C.·1994·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

One recent approach that holds promise for building a conceptual framework for a psychological individual difference variable in equity theory is Equity Sensitivity (Huseman, Hatfield and Miles, 1987). Huseman et al. identify three types of individuals — Benevolents, Equity Sensitives, Entitleds. As originally defined, these three groups vary in their desire for outcomes (e.g. pay) in a relationship. The purpose of this study is to test whether the three groups — Benevolents, Equity Sensitives, and Entitleds — vary in the importance they place on categories of outcomes. Hypotheses are tested regarding importance placed on extrinsic tangible, extrinsic intangible, and intrinsic work outcomes. The sample include 2617 employees from the banking and public utility industries. Results show that the three groups vary in the importance they place on extrinsic tangible and intrinsic outcomes, but not on the importance placed on extrinsic intangible outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.4030150704

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hatfield, John D.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-12
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
585-596
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2037615146
Cited by
148
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
equity sensitivity, equity theory, individual differences, wages, bank employees, public utility employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review