The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait
Abstract
The repeatability of gait variables is an important consideration in the clinical use of results of quantitative gait analysis. Statistical measures were used to evaluate repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data waveforms and spatiotemporal parameters of 40 normal subjects. Subjects were evaluated three times on each test day and on three different test days while walking at their preferred or natural speed. Intrasubject repeatability was excellent for kinematic data in the sagittal plane both within a test day as well as between test days. For joint angle motion in the frontal and transverse planes, the repeatability was good within a test day and poor between test days. Poor between‐day repeatability of joint angle motion in the frontal and transverse planes was noted to be partly due to variabilities in the alignment of markers. Vertical reaction and fore–aft shear forces were more repeatable than the mediolateral shear force. Sagittal plane joint moments were more repeatable than frontal or transverse plane moments. For electromyographic data, repeatability within a day was slightly better than between test days. In general, the results demonstrate that with the subjects walking at their natural or preferred spped, the gait variables are quite repeatable. These observations suggest that it may be reasonable to base significant clinical decisions on the results of a single gait evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mayagoitia, R. E., Nene, A. V., & Veltink, P. H. (2002) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00231-7 · Cited by 655
Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis
Besier, T. F., Sturnieks, D. L., Alderson, J. A., & Lloyd, D. G. (2003) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00087-3 · Cited by 532
A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function
van den Bogert, A. J., Geijtenbeek, T., Even-Zohar, O., Steenbrink, F., & Hardin, E. C. (2013) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-013-1076-z · Cited by 392
Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications
Benedetti, M., Catani, F., Leardini, A., Pignotti, E., & Giannini, S. (1998) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(97)00041-7 · Cited by 326
Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity
Al-Amri, M., Nicholas, K., Button, K., Sparkes, V., Sheeran, L., & Davies, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18030719 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Kadaba, M. P., Ramakrishnan, H. K., Wootten, M. E., Gainey, J., Gorton, G., & Cochran, G. V. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 849-860
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2128822529
- Cited by
- 1,476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.1100070611
- The paper
- Kadaba, M. P., Ramakrishnan, H. K., Wootten, M. E., Gainey, J., Gorton, G., & Cochran, G. V. B. (1989). Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100070611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.