Cited by 655Gait Recognition and AnalysisLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems

Mayagoitia, Ruth E., Nene, Anand V., Veltink, Peter H.·2002·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

A general-purpose system to obtain the kinematics of gait in the sagittal plane based on body-mounted sensors was developed. It consisted of four uniaxial seismic accelerometers and one rate gyroscope per body segment. Tests were done with 10 young healthy volunteers, walking at five different speeds on a treadmill. In order to study the system's accuracy, measurements were made with an optic, passive-marker system and the body-mounted system, simultaneously. In all the comparison cases, the curves obtained from the two systems were very close, showing root mean square errors representing <7% full range in 75% of the cases (overall mean 6.64%, standard deviation 4.13%) and high coefficients of multiple correlation in 100% of cases (overall mean 0.9812, standard deviation 0.02). Calibration of the body-mounted system is done against gravity. The body-mounted sensors do not hinder natural movement. The calculation algorithms are computationally demanding and only are applicable off-line. The body-mounted sensors are accurate, inexpensive and portable and allow long-term recordings in clinical, sport and ergonomics settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00231-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayagoitia, R. E., Nene, A. V., & Veltink, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
  • Roessingh Research and Development (NL)
Corresponding author
Mayagoitia, Ruth E.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
537-542
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967159897
Cited by
655
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 42
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
gait kinematics, body-mounted sensors, seismic accelerometers, rate gyroscope, low-cost motion capture, sagittal plane, treadmill walking, sensor calibration, measurement accuracy
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Electronic Data Processing, Biomechanical Phenomena, Equipment Design, Foot, Gait, Humans, Leg, Male, Movement, Reproducibility of Results, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review