The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peri‐implant mucositis
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: This narrative review was prepared for the 2017 World Workshop of the American Academy of Periodontology and European Federation of Periodontology to address key questions related to the clinical condition of peri‐implant mucositis, including: 1) the definition of peri‐implant mucositis, 2) conversion of peri‐implant health to the biofilm‐induced peri‐implant mucositis lesion, 3) reversibility of peri‐implant mucositis, 4) the long‐standing peri‐implant mucositis lesion, 5) similarities and differences between peri‐implant mucositis at implants and gingivitis at teeth, and 6) risk indicators/factors for peri‐implant mucositis. Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and The Cochrane Library up to and including July 31, 2016, was carried out using the search strategy (peri‐implant[All Fields] AND (“mucositis”[MeSH Terms] OR “mucositis”[All Fields])) OR (periimplant[All Fields] AND mucosits[All Fields]). Prospective, retrospective, and cross‐sectional studies and review papers that focused on risk factors/indicators for peri‐implant mucositis as well as experimental peri‐implant mucositis studies in animals and humans were included. Findings: Peri‐implant mucositis is an inflammatory lesion of the soft tissues surrounding an endosseous implant in the absence of loss of supporting bone or continuing marginal bone loss. A cause‐and‐effect relationship between experimental accumulation of bacterial biofilms around titanium dental implants and the development of an inflammatory response has been demonstrated. The experimental peri‐implant mucositis lesion is characterized by an inflammatory cell infiltrate present within the connective tissue lateral to the barrier epithelium. In long‐standing peri‐implant mucositis, the inflammatory cell infiltrate is larger in size than in the early (3‐week) experimental peri‐implant mucositis lesion. Biofilm‐induced peri‐implant mucositis is reversible at the host biomarker level once biofilm control is reinstituted. Reversal of the clinical signs of inflammation may take longer than 3 weeks. Factors identified as risk indicators for peri‐implant mucositis include biofilm accumulation, smoking, and radiation. Further evidence is required for potential risk factors, including diabetes, lack of keratinized mucosa, and presence of excess luting cement. Conclusions: Peri‐implant mucositis is caused by biofilm accumulation which disrupts the host–microbe homeostasis at the implant–mucosa interface, resulting in an inflammatory lesion. Peri‐implant mucositis is a reversible condition at the host biomarker level. Therefore, the clinical implication is that optimal biofilm removal is a prerequisite for the prevention and management of peri‐implant mucositis. An understanding of peri‐implant mucositis is important because it is considered a precursor for peri‐implantitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While there is strong evidence that peri-implant mucositis is caused by plaque, there is very limited evidence for non-plaque induced periimplant mucositis.”
From A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“While there is strong evidence that peri-implant mucositis is caused by plaque, there is very limited evidence for non-plaque induced periimplant mucositis.”
From A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Peri-implant mucositis can be reversed with measures aimed at eliminating the plaque.”
From A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental gingivitis in man
Löe, H., Theilade, E., & Jensen, S. B. (1965) · The Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177 · Cited by 3,481
The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants
Mombelli, A., van Oosten, M. A. C., Schürch, E., & Lang, N. P. (1987) · Oral Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x · Cited by 2,056
Peri‐implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology
Lindhe, J., Meyle, J., & on behalf of Group D of the European Workshop on Periodontology (2008) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01283.x · Cited by 1,524
Definition and prevalence of peri‐implant diseases
Zitzmann, N. U., & Berglundh, T. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01274.x · Cited by 1,112
Peri‐implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators
Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A. (2008) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01275.x · Cited by 898
Self-citationCurrent View of Risk Factors for Periodontal Diseases
Genco, R. J. (1996) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1996.67.10s.1041 · Cited by 686
The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri‐implant mucositis
Bollen, C. M. L., Papaioannou, W., Eldere, J. V., Schepers, E., Quirynen, M., & van Steenberghe, D. (1996) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x · Cited by 669
Wilson, T. G. (2009) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090115 · Cited by 601
Nine‐ to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri‐implant lesions
Roos‐Jansåker, A., Lindahl, C., Renvert, H., & Renvert, S. (2006) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00906.x · Cited by 572
Experimentally induced peri‐implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans.
Pontoriero, R., Tonelli, M., Carnevale, G., Mombelli, A., Nyman, S. R., & Lang, N. P. (1994) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050409.x · Cited by 553
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Albrektsson T, Consensus report of session IV. Proceedings of the first European workshop on periodontology, 365
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caton, J. G., Armitage, G., Berglundh, T., Chapple, I. L. C., Jepsen, S., Kornman, K. S., Mealey, B. L., Papapanou, P. N., Sanz, M., & Tonetti, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.18-0157 · Cited by 1,845
Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila‐Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12957 · Cited by 1,755
Self-citationBerglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila‐Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.17-0739 · Cited by 861
Self-citationRenvert, S., Persson, G. R., Pirih, F. Q., & Camargo, P. M. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.17-0588 · Cited by 367
Romandini, M., Lima, C., Pedrinaci, I., Araoz, A., Soldini, M. C., & Sanz, M. (2020) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13684 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Heitz‐Mayfield, L. J. A., & Salvi, G. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Heitz‐Mayfield, Lisa J.A.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S257-S266
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2922226940
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Keywords
- peri-implant mucositis, dental implants, bacterial biofilms, peri-implantitis, risk factors, smoking, radiation, diabetes mellitus, keratinized mucosa, luting cement, host biomarkers, inflammatory cell infiltration, reversibility, gingivitis, periodontitis, marginal bone loss, host-microbe interactions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Plaque, Humans, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Dental Implants, Mucositis, Peri-Implantitis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review