The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains
Abstract
A procedure was developed for extraction of ‘free’ condensed tannins (CT) using a mixture of acetone/water/diethyl ether (4.7:2.0:3.3), followed by extraction of protein‐bound and fibre‐bound CT using boiling sodium dodecyl sulphate containing 2‐mercaptoethanol (SDS). CT concentrations in all three fractions were determined by a modified butanol‐HCI procedure. Separate standard curves using purified CT in water or SDS solution were utilised for analysis of extractable CT (water standards) and protein‐bound and fibre‐bound CT (SDS standards). The method accurately predicted the concentration of CT added to forage extracts. CT extractable in acetone/water/diethyl ether comprised, on average. 68% of total CT in a range of freeze dried forage legume samples, with most of the remainder being bound to protein. When total CT concentration was low (0.6‐3.0% DM), a lower proportion was extractable (33‐35%). In protein concentrate meals containing CT, the extractable, protein‐bound and fibre‐bound components comprised 15, 60 and 25% respectively of total CT. Total CT concentration in the forages Lotus corniculatus and Coronilla varia was considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition (2.1 and 3.0% DM). whilst CT concentration in the forage of Dorycnium spp (13–19% DM) was more suitable for soil conservation purposes. The substantial CT concentration in cottonseed meal (1.6% DM) may be involved in the high resistance of proteins in this product to ruminal degradation. CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, Q., Liu, X., Zhao, G., Hu, T., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2017.09.004 · Cited by 555
The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats1
Puchala, R., Min, B. R., Goetsch, A. L., & Sahlu, T. (2005) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2005.831182x · Cited by 314
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Aboagye, I. A., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9110856 · Cited by 186
Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J., & Shao, T. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9406 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Terrill, T. H., Rowan, A. M., Douglas, G. B., & Barry, T. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-329
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2000042298
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jsfa.2740580306
- The paper
- Terrill, T. H., Rowan, A. M., Douglas, G. B., & Barry, T. N. (1992). Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740580306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.