The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables
Abstract
Phenolic secondary metabolites play an important role in plant‐derived food quality, as they affect quality characteristics such as appearance, flavour and health‐promoting properties. Their content in foods is affected by many factors that influence phenolic stability, biosynthesis and degradation. In terms of their biosynthesis the key enzyme phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL) is especially relevant, as it can be induced by different stress (environmental) conditions. In addition, polyphenol oxidases (PPO) and peroxidases (POD) are the main enzymes responsible for quality loss due to phenolic degradation. The different factors affecting phenolic‐related food quality are reviewed. These include internal (genetic) and environmental (agronomic) factors, technological treatments applied during postharvest storage of fruits and vegetables, as well as processing and storage of the processed products. The different strategies that are required to either maintain or enhance the phenolic‐related quality of foods are critically reviewed. Genetic modification designed to decrease polyphenol oxidases or peroxidases is not always a feasible method, owing to side problems related to the growth and defence of the plant. Agronomic treatments can be used to enhance the phenolic content and pigmentation of fruits and vegetables, although the information available on this topic is very scarce and even contradictory. Some postharvest treatments (cold storage, controlled or modified atmospheres, etc) can also improve phenolic‐related quality, as well as new processing methods such as irradiation (gamma, UV), high‐field electric pulses, high hydrostatic pressures and microwaves. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes
Jang, M., Cai, L., Udeani, G. O., Slowing, K. V., Thomas, C. F., Beecher, C. W. W., Fong, H. H. S., Farnsworth, N. R., Kinghorn, A. D., Mehta, R. G., et al. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5297.218 · Cited by 4,935
Multicopper oxidases and oxygenases
Solomon, E. I., Sundaram, U. M., & Machonkin, T. E. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr950046o · Cited by 3,664
Dietary Intake and Bioavailability of Polyphenols
Scalbert, A., & Williamson, G. (2000) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/130.8.2073s · Cited by 3,658
Chlorogenic Acid and Caffeic Acid Are Absorbed in Humans
Olthof, M. R., Katan, M. B., & Hollman, P. C. H. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.1.66 · Cited by 975
Harbowy, M. E., Balentine, D. A., Davies, A. P., & Cai, Y. (1997) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689709701956 · Cited by 459
Cited by
The gut microbiota: a key factor in the therapeutic effects of (poly)phenols
Espín, J. C., González-Sarrías, A., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2017) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.033 · Cited by 603
Self-citationKanatt, S. R., Chander, R., & Sharma, A. (2010) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02124.x · Cited by 357
Relevance of Natural Phenolics from Grape and Derivative Products in the Formulation of Cosmetics
Soto, M., Falqué, E., & Domínguez, H. (2015) · Cosmetics · doi:10.3390/cosmetics2030259 · Cited by 190
Nutrition, Well-Being and Health
(2012) · doi:10.5772/1864 · Cited by 178
Terefe, N. S., Matthies, K., Simons, L., & Versteeg, C. (2009) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2008.12.003 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomás‐Barberán, F. A., & Espín, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06-13
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 853-876
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W1571086446
- Cited by
- 1,288
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.