Cited by 106Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Changes in coping strategies, relationship to the perpetrator, and posttraumatic distress in female crime victims

Open access
Gutner, Cassidy A., Rizvi, Shireen L., Monson, Candice M., Resick, Patricia A.·2006·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between changes in coping and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology among recent female rape and physical assault victims as a function of assault type and perpetrator status. Participants were assessed within 1 month after trauma and again at 3 months after trauma. Results indicate that changes in coping strategies over time are associated with the severity of the PTSD symptoms. Assault type was not a significant factor in the association between changes in coping and PTSD, but perpetrator status was. Victims with known perpetrators, who coped more by social withdrawal, had more severe PTSD symptoms over time. The importance of examining the dynamic nature of coping in the development of PTSD is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.20158

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the months following sexual assault, many survivors experience at least some natural remission of their initial symptoms.

    “Prospective studies demonstrate that, over the months following sexual assault, many survivors experience at least some natural remission of their initial symptoms (e.g., Gutner, et al., 2006; Riggs et al., 1995; Rothbaum et al., 1992)”

    From PTSD in the Year Following Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies (2023) · cites this paper as Gutner, et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gutner, C. A., Rizvi, S. L., Monson, C. M., & Resick, P. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Resick, Patricia A.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
813-823
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2143997122
Cited by
105
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH046992, R01-MH6992)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
coping strategies, post-traumatic stress disorder, rape, physical assault, known perpetrators, social withdrawal, PTSD symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Rape, Regression Analysis, Social Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Violence, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review