Cited by 9Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Associations between therapist factors and treatment efficacy in randomized controlled trials of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children and youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Grainger, Lauren, Thompson, Zoe, Morina, Nexhmedin, Hoppen, Thole, Meiser‐Stedman, Richard·2022·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Previous research suggests that the effect of therapist factors on patient outcomes is significant. Yet, to date, no reviews have explored the potential effects of therapist characteristics on treatment outcomes for children and youth with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the professional characteristics of trial therapists delivering trauma-focused cognitive behavioral interventions (TF-CBT) for child PTSD in clinical trials and understand the association between treatment efficacy and therapist factors. Systematic searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through November 3, 2020, were conducted; 40 RCTs were included in the full review. PTSD treatment outcome data were extracted from each publication along with any available data regarding trial therapists. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes of interventions conducted by different types of therapists. All therapist groups yielded significant effects for TF-CBT relative to active and passive control conditions, with the largest effect size, Hedges' g = -1.11, for RCTs that used clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. A significant moderating effect was found when comparing the treatment outcomes of clinical psychologists and psychiatrists versus other professionals, p = .044; however, this effect was no longer apparent when only studies with an active control arm were included. Further moderator analyses demonstrated no significant differences regarding therapists' educational and professional backgrounds and PTSD treatment outcomes. The current RCT evidence for TF-CBT for children and youth with PTSD does not suggest that therapist educational or professional background influences treatment efficacy. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22840

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TF-CBT has sustainable long-term benefits in significantly reducing PTSD symptoms compared to control treatments.

    “researchers in the study [29] affirm the sustainable long-term benefits of TF-CBT in significantly reducing PTSD symptoms compared to control treatments.”

    From Clinical Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Meta-analysis; page unavailable) report that TF-CBT reduced PTSD symptoms more than control conditions in trials of children and youth. But the Methods (Statistical analyses; page unavailable) explicitly say follow-up data were excluded, so this paper does not establish that the benefit was sustained long term. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1097/01.chi.0000111364.94169.f9 · DOI
  2. Fjermestad K. W., 2016, The Oxford handbook of treatment processes and outcomes in psychology: A multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial approach, 97
  3. Norcross J. C., 2019, Evidence‐based therapist contributions
  4. 10.1146/annurev‐clinpsy‐032816‐045217 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grainger, L., Thompson, Z., Morina, N., Hoppen, T., & Meiser‐Stedman, R.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Department of Psychology University of Münster Münster Germany
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Grainger, Lauren
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1405-1419
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W4225012912
Cited by
9
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, therapist factors, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, treatment efficacy, children and young people, trauma treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review