Cited by 172Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaChild Therapy and Development

Research review: psychological and psychosocial treatments for children and young people with post-traumatic stress disorder: a network meta-analysis

Open access
Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia, Megnin‐Viggars, Odette, Daly, Caitlin, Dias, Sofia, Stockton, Sarah, Meiser‐Stedman, Richard, Trickey, David, Pilling, Stephen·2020·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially chronic and disabling disorder that affects a significant minority of youth exposed to trauma. Previous studies have concluded that trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) is an effective treatment for PTSD in youth, but the relative strengths of different psychological therapies are poorly understood. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analyses of psychological and psychosocial interventions for children and young people with PTSD. Outcomes included PTSD symptom change scores post-treatment and at 1-4-month follow-up, and remission post-treatment. RESULTS: We included 32 trials of 17 interventions and 2,260 participants. Overall, the evidence was of moderate-to-low quality. No inconsistency was detected between direct and indirect evidence. Individual forms of TF-CBT showed consistently large effects in reducing PTSD symptoms post-treatment compared with waitlist. The order of interventions by descending magnitude of effect versus waitlist was as follows: cognitive therapy for PTSD (SMD -2.94, 95%CrI -3.94 to -1.95), combined somatic/cognitive therapies, child-parent psychotherapy, combined TF-CBT/parent training, meditation, narrative exposure, exposure/prolonged exposure, play therapy, Cohen TF-CBT/cognitive processing therapy (CPT), eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), parent training, group TF-CBT, supportive counselling and family therapy (SMD -0.37, 95%CrI -1.60 to 0.84). Results for parent training, supportive counselling and family therapy were inconclusive. Cohen TF-CBT/CPT, group TF-CBT and supportive counselling had the largest evidence base. Results regarding changes in PTSD symptoms at follow-up and remission post-treatment were uncertain due to limited evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy, in particular individual forms, appears to be most effective in the management of PTSD in youth. EMDR is effective but to a lesser extent. Supportive counselling does not appear to be effective. Results suggest a large positive effect for emotional freedom technique, child-parent psychotherapy, combined TF-CBT/parent training, and meditation, but further research is needed to confirm these findings as they were based on very limited evidence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.13094

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dias, S., Ades, A. E., Welton, N. J., Jansen, J. P., & Sutton, A. J. (2018). Network Metaanalysis for Decision-Making. In Generalised Linear Models (pp. 93-154). Hoboken NJ: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mavranezouli, I., Megnin‐Viggars, O., Daly, C., Dias, S., Stockton, S., Meiser‐Stedman, R., Trickey, D., & Pilling, S.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Anna Freud Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
18-29
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2960477558
Cited by
172
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, children and young people, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological intervention, psychosocial interventions, EMDR, cognitive processing therapy, parent training, child-parent psychotherapy, narrative exposure therapy, prolonged exposure, supportive counseling, family therapy, meditation, Emotional Freedom Technique, play therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review