Cited by 249biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Modification of poly(L‐lactides) by blending: mechanical and hydrolytic behavior

Hiljanen‐Vainio, Mari, Varpomaa, Paula, Seppälä, Jukka, Törmälä, Pertti·1996·Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics

Abstract

Abstract Two different poly(L‐lactides) (PLLAb and PLLAa) were blended with poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and an elastic poly(ε‐caprolactone/L‐lactide) P(CL/L‐LA) copolymer to modify the mechanical properties of PLLA. Blends of both PLLAs with 20 wt.‐% of PCL were prepared. PLLAa was blended with 20 wt.‐% of P(CL/L‐LA) copolymer, and blends of PLLAb and P(CL/L‐LA) copolymer were made with copolymer contents of 5, 10, 20 and 30 wt.‐%. The tensile properties and impact and shear strengths were determined as a measure of the mechanical properties. The hydrolytic behavior of the blends was investigated, and the changes in shear strength as a function of hydrolysis were followed. The structure of the hydrolyzed samples was studied by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The properties of PLLA changed considerably when blended with PCL or P(CL/L‐LA) copolymer. An increasing amount of copolymer in PLLAb decreased tensile modulus and shear strength, but improved the strain and impact strength. In hydrolysis, blends containing PLLAa degraded slower than blends of PLLAb because of the higher initial molar mass and purity of PLLAa. The molar masses of PLLAb blends decreased dramatically, and less than 10% of the initial molar masses and shear strengths were left after 12 weeks in vitro. The morphology of the blends affected the degradation. The blends containing P(CL/L‐LA) copolymer had a porous structure which facilitated water absorption into the blend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/macp.1996.021970427

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiljanen‐Vainio, M., Varpomaa, P., Seppälä, J., & Törmälä, P.
Affiliations
Tampere University of Technology (FI)
Corresponding author
Seppälä, Jukka
Venue
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-04
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
1503-1523
ISSN
  • 1022-1352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3935
OpenAlex
W1991387651
Cited by
249
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
poly(L-lactic acid), polycaprolactone, polymer blends, mechanical properties, hydrolytic degradation, tensile properties, impact strength, shear strength, blend morphology, water absorption, biodegradable polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review