Cited by 857biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (ε-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo

Pitt, G.G., Gratzl, M.M., Kimmel, G.L., Surles, J., Sohindler, A.·1981·Biomaterials

Abstract

The mechanisms of biodegradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (epsilon-caprolactone), and copolymers of epsilon-caprolactone with DL-dilactide, delta-valerolactone, and DL-epsilon-decalactone in rabbit were shown to be qualitatively similar. However, the rate of the first stage of the degradation process, non-enzymatic random hydrolytic chain scission, varied by an order of magnitude and was dependent on morphological as well as chemical effects. Weight loss was generally not observed until the molecular weight had decreased to 15,000 or less. Poly (DL-lactide) differed from the other polyesters studied, the rate of chain scission increasing after the commencement of weight loss. The rate of weight loss was greater and the period prior to weight loss was shorter when the comonomer content of copolymers of epsilon-caprolactone was sufficient to reduce the melting point of epsilon-caproate sequences to body temperature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90060-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural variations in the midblock, such as changes in substituent size or location, provide a mechanism for tuning the thermal, mechanical, and degradation behavior of the product block polymer.

    “Structural variations in the midblock, such as changes in the substituent size or location, provide another mechanism for tuning the thermal, mechanical, and degradation behavior of the product block polymer.”

    From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [21]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitt, G. G., Gratzl, M. M., Kimmel, G. L., Surles, J., & Sohindler, A.
Affiliations
RTI International (US)
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-10
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
215-220
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067673936
Cited by
857
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 37
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Keywords
poly(D,L-lactide), polycaprolactone, copolymers, biodegradation, non-enzymatic degradation, weight loss, melting point, comonomer content, aliphatic polyesters, rabbits
MeSH terms
Animals, Biodegradation, Environmental, Mathematics, Molecular Weight, Polyesters, Rabbits, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review