The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Never eat in that restaurant, I did!”: Exploring why people engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication
Abstract
What do consumers want to achieve when they engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication (N‐WOM)? Two studies explore this question and reveal that consumers pursue specific goals when engaging in N‐WOM and that these goals systematically differ between the specific negative emotions that are experienced. For example, the results reveal that consumers who experience anger engage in N‐WOM to vent feelings or to take revenge. However, disappointed consumers engage in N‐WOM to warn others, and consumers who experience regret communicate with others to strengthen social bonds or to warn them. This reveals the functionality of specific emotions to N‐WOM, and how goals for N‐WOM are associated with these emotions. This demonstrates that rather than being uniform, the content and implications of N‐WOM are contingent on the specific emotions that consumers experience. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061 · Cited by 3,072
Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes
Westbrook, R. A. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400302 · Cited by 2,462
Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.
Berkowitz, L. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59 · Cited by 2,283
Cited by
Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research
Berger, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002 · Cited by 1,469
Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators
de Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0121-1 · Cited by 1,078
Hospitality and Tourism Online Reviews: Recent Trends and Future Directions
Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2015) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2014.933154 · Cited by 640
The Role of User-Generated Content in Tourists' Travel Planning Behavior
Cox, C., Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., & Buultjens, J. (2009) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368620903235753 · Cited by 558
Customer engagement behaviors and hotel responses
Wei, W., Miao, L., & Huang, Z. (. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.10.002 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Wetzer, I. M., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-19
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 661-680
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2155564152
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.