CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76Management and Organizational StudiesBusiness Strategy and InnovationElite Sociology and Global Capitalism

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Competing in groups

Rowley, Tim J., Baum, Joel A. C., Shipilov, Andrew V., Greve, Henrich R., Rao, Hayagreeva·2004·Managerial and Decision Economics
DOI 10.1002/mde.1201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study, we examine how the characteristics of clique structures affect the performance of firms embedded within the cliques. Although it is generally accepted in organization theory and strategic management that firms are embedded within ego and overarching industry networks that each affect their behavior and performance, there is little evidence on whether cliques are stable features of industry networks or affect firm behavior or performance. We theorize that the value of a clique to its members depends on (1) the network centrality of the clique and (2) the internal structure and organization (heterogeneity and inequality) of the clique. Our analysis of the Canadian investment banking industry from 1952 to 1990 provides empirical evidence of stable cliques, and indicates that while a clique's internal structure and organization materially affect firm‐level benefits of clique membership, its positional embeddedness within the industry network does not. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mde.1201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. 10.2307/2667105 · DOI
  2. Aldrich HE, 1979, Organizations and Environments
  3. 10.2307/2094626 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  5. Baum JAC, 2002, The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organization: Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert, 191, 10.4337/9781035335503.00020 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/2095230 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Blau P, 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
  8. 10.1086/228631 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/270991 · DOI
  10. Brager G, 1978, Changing Human Service Organizations: Politics and Practice
  11. 10.4159/9780674029095 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/1043463195007003003 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<1::AID-SMJ63>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  14. 10.2307/1251776 · DOI
  15. Coase RH, 1937, The Firm, the Market and the Law
  16. 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1287/mnsc.33.9.1102 · DOI
  18. Cyert R, 1963, A Behavorial Theory of the Firm
  19. 10.2307/2666995 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0049-089X(92)90016-A · DOI
  21. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998110)19:11<1029::AID-SMJ992>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  22. Eccles RG, 1988, Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work
  23. 10.2307/3033543 · DOI
  24. Fujiwara‐Greve T, 2000, Organizational ecology and job mobility, Social Forces, 79, 547, 10.2307/2675509 · DOI
  25. Gomes‐Casseres B, 1994, Group versus group: how alliance networks compete, Harvard Business Review, 62
  26. Granovetter M, 1994, Handbook of Economic Sociology, 453
  27. 10.1086/228311 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/2393756 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/210179 · DOI
  30. 10.1086/226424 · DOI
  31. Hawley A, 1950, Human Ecology
  32. 10.2307/1912352 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1287/mksc.9.1.74 · DOI
  34. Johnson R, 1982, Contracting problems and regulation: the case of the fishery, American Economic Review, 72, 1005
  35. Kennedy P, 1992, A Guide to Econometrics
  36. 10.1002/smj.4250090403 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/3088882 · DOI
  38. 10.2307/2393394 · DOI
  39. Laumann EO, 1987, The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains
  40. Lazarsfeld PF, 1954, The Varied Sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, 298
  41. 10.2307/1912003 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0378-8733(92)90007-T · DOI
  43. Lorange P, 1992, Strategic Alliances
  44. Madhavan R, 2001, Working Paper
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<439::AID-DIA952>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1366/000370258774615410 · DOI
  47. 10.1525/9780520314696 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/smj.4250120909 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/0198288735.001.0001 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1 <165::AID-SMJ914>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  51. Pfeffer J, 1978, The External Control of Organizations
  52. 10.2307/2393299 · DOI
  53. 10.1086/230091 · DOI
  54. 10.2307/1924589 · DOI
  55. 10.2307/2393988 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Powell WW, 1994, The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 368
  57. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.scaman.2004.07.001 · DOI
  59. Sharpe, 1985, Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector: The Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project, 159
  60. 10.2307/2550441 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Stuart TE, 1996, Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21, 10.1002/smj.4250171004 · DOI
  62. 10.2307/2666998 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/0167-2681(92)90050-L · DOI
  64. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  65. Tuma NB, 1984, Social Dynamics: Models and Methods
  66. 10.2307/2096399 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.2307/2393808 · DOI
  68. 10.2307/2657252 · DOI
  69. 10.1287/orsc.8.2.109 · DOI
  70. 10.1017/CBO9780511815478 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1086/210318 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Willer D, 1981, Network, Exchange and Coercion
  73. Williamson OE, 1975, Markets and Hierarchies
  74. Williamson OE, 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting
  75. 10.2307/2393356 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Status quo and challenges in air transport management research

    Wandelt, S., Antoniou, C., Birolini, S., Delahaye, D., Dresner, M., Fu, X., Gössling, S., Hong, S.-J., Odoni, A. R., Zanin, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Air Transport Research Society · doi:10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100014 · Cited by 67

    “The competition between firms has evolved from firm versus firm competition to something that can be described better as group versus group competition , in terms of such as supply chains and strategic alliances ( Rowley et al., 2004 ).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Rowley, T. J., Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rao, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Baum, Joel A. C.
ORCID
Venue
Managerial and Decision Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
25
Issue
6-7
Pages
453-471
ISSN
  • 0143-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1468
DOI
10.1002/mde.1201
OpenAlex
W2041591216
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 22 d)
Locations
  • Managerial and Decision Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Keywords
industry networks, firm performance, network centrality, investment banking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review