The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scales to assess psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations
Abstract
Psychotic symptoms are a frequent occurrence in Parkinson's disease (PD), affecting up to 50% of patients. The Movement Disorder Society established a Task Force on Rating Scales in PD, and this critique applies to published, peer‐reviewed rating psychosis scales used in PD psychosis studies. Twelve psychosis scales/questionnaires were reviewed. None of the reviewed scales adequately captured the entire phenomenology of PD psychosis. While the Task Force has labeled some scales as “recommended” or “suggested” based on the fulfilling‐defined criteria, none of the current scales contained all the basic content, mechanistic and psychometric properties needed to capture PD psychotic phenomena and to measure clinical response over time. Different scales may be better for some settings versus others. Since one scale may not be able to serve all needs, a scale used to measure clinical response and change over time [such as the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS)] may need to be combined with another scale better at cataloging specific features [such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) or Schedule for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)]. At the present time, for clinical trials on PD psychosis assessing new treatments, the following are recommended primary outcome scales: NPI (for the cognitively impaired PD population or when a caregiver is required), SAPS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (for the cognitively intact PD population or when the patient is the sole informant). The CGIS is suggested as a secondary outcome scale to measure change and response to treatment over time. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308 · Cited by 7,568
Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson's disease: Non‐L‐dopa–responsive problems dominate at 15 years
Hely, M. A., Morris, J. G. L., Reid, W. G. J., & Trafficante, R. (2005) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.20324 · Cited by 1,050
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): rationale and standardisation
Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Lindenmayer, J.-P. (1989) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000291514 · Cited by 1,016
Predictors of Nursing Home Placement in Parkinson's Disease: A Population‐Based, Prospective Study
Aarsland, D., Larsen, J. P., Tandberg, E., & Laake, K. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06891.x · Cited by 811
Self-citationDiagnostic criteria for psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS, NIMH work group
Ravina, B., Marder, K., Fernandez, H. H., Friedman, J. H., McDonald, W., Murphy, D., Aarsland, D., Babcock, D., Cummings, J., Endicott, J., et al. (2007) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.21382 · Cited by 528
Self-citationPeralta, V., & Cuesta, M. J. (1999) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00003-1 · Cited by 195
Auditory hallucinations in Parkinson's disease
Inzelberg, R., Kipervasser, S., & Korczyn, A. D. (1998) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.64.4.533 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Goetz, C. G., Tilley, B. C., Shaftman, S. R., Stebbins, G. T., Fahn, S., Martinez‐Martin, P., Poewe, W., Sampaio, C., Stern, M. B., Dodel, R., et al. (2008) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22340 · Cited by 7,536
Self-citationThe psychosis spectrum in Parkinson disease
ffytche, D. H., Creese, B., Politis, M., Chaudhuri, K. R., Weintraub, D., Ballard, C., & Aarsland, D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.200 · Cited by 355
Self-citationRisk factors for non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease
Marinus, J., Zhu, K., Marras, C., Aarsland, D., & van Hilten, J. J. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30127-3 · Cited by 348
Self-citationApathy and anhedonia rating scales in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations
Leentjens, A. F. G., Dujardin, K., Marsh, L., Martinez‐Martin, P., Richard, I. H., Starkstein, S. E., Weintraub, D., Sampaio, C., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., et al. (2008) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.22229 · Cited by 346
Self-citationEpidemiology of psychosis in Parkinson's disease
Fénelon, G., & Alves, G. (2010) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.014 · Cited by 330
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandez, H. H., Aarsland, D., Fénelon, G., Friedman, J. H., Marsh, L., Tröster, A. I., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Sampaio, C., Stebbins, G. T., & Goetz, C. G.
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 484-500
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2030511222
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scales to assess psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.21875
- The paper
- Fernandez, H. H., Aarsland, D., Fénelon, G., Friedman, J. H., Marsh, L., Tröster, A. I., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Sampaio, C., Stebbins, G. T., & Goetz, C. G. (2008). Scales to assess psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Critique and recommendations. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
