Cited by 29Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Insight change in psychosis: relationship with neurocognition, social cognition, clinical symptoms and phase of illness

Open access
Quee, P. J., van der Meer, L., Krabbendam, L., de Haan, L., Cahn, W., Wiersma, D., van Beveren, N., Pijnenborg, G. H. M. +3 more·2014·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Impaired insight is an important and prevalent symptom of psychosis. It remains unclear whether cognitive disturbances hamper improvements in insight. We investigated the neurocognitive, social cognitive, and clinical correlates of changes in insight. Method: One hundred and fifty‐four patients with a psychotic disorder were assessed at baseline (T0) and after three years (T3) with the Birchwood Insight Scale, the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale, measures of neurocognition and social cognition. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine to what extend neurocognition, social cognition, clinical symptoms and phase of illness could uniquely predict insight change. Subsequently, changes in these factors were related to insight change. Results: Better neurocognitive performance and fewer clinical symptoms at baseline explained insight improvements. The additional effect of clinical symptoms over and above the contribution of neurocognition was significant. Together, these factors explained 10% of the variance. Social cognition and phase of illness could not predict insight change. Changes in clinical symptoms, but not changes in neurocognitive performance were associated with insight change. Conclusion: Neurocognitive abilities may predict, in part, the development of insight in psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12138

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. J onsd ottir H, Opjordsmoen S, Birkenaes AB et al. Predic- tors of medication adherence in patients with schizophre- nia or bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2013; 127:23-33.
  2. Nuechterlein KH, Barch DM, Gold JM, Goldberg TE, Green MF, Heaton RK. Identification of separable cognitivefactors in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2004;72: 29-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quee, P. J., van der Meer, L., Krabbendam, L., de Haan, L., Cahn, W., Wiersma, D., van Beveren, N., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., Mulder, C. L., Bruggeman, R., & Aleman, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Rehabilitation Lentis Center for Mental Health Zuidlaren the Netherlands
  • Faculty of Psychology and Education Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • Department of Psychiatry Academic Medical Center Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Delta Center for Mental Health Care Poortugaal the Netherlands
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Quee, P. J.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-18
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
126-133
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2148955207
Cited by
29
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insight, psychosis, neurocognitive function, social cognition, clinical symptoms, PANSS, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Linear Models, Disease Progression, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review