CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

The Psychosocial and Healthcare Utilisation Experiences of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus From Diagnosis to 12 Months Postnatal: A Protocol for a Qualitative, Longitudinal Interview Study

Open access
Benton, Madeleine, Payne, Elana, Waheed, Nabiha, Turner, Katrina, Murphy, Helen R., Skouteris, Helen, Ismail, Khalida, Silverio, Sergio A.·2025·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
DOI 10.1002/mpr.70038PMC PMC12426312
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects a significant and growing proportion of women each year. We know little about how their needs and experiences change over the perinatal period. This study aims to explore the psychosocial and healthcare experiences of women with a GDM diagnosis from pregnancy to 12‐month postnatal. Methods: This is a qualitative, longitudinal study comprising of individual interviews with women diagnosed with GDM who live in the UK at three time points: 35‐weeks’ gestation; 3‐months postnatal; 12‐months postnatal. Data will be analysed using template analysis. Comparisons will be made both between participants and timepoints to allow for biographical and temporal interpretations. Results: This study will provide in‐depth insights into women's lived‐experiences, psychosocial needs, and interactions with healthcare services. Particular attention will be given to the transition between antenatal and postnatal periods. Conclusion: Study findings will support the co‐development of a tailored mother‐infant dyad intervention grounded in women's needs and preferences across the perinatal period, aimed at improving long‐term health outcomes for women and their children with a focus on diabetes prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.70038

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Annells, M. 1996. “ Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism.” Qualitative Health Research 6, no. 3: 379– 393. 10.1177/104973239600600306. · DOI
  2. Archibald, M. M., R. C. Ambagtsheer, M. G. Casey, and M. Lawless. 2019. “ Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1609406919874596. 10.1177/1609406919874596. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aune, D., T. Norat, P. Romundstad, and L. J. Vatten. 2014. “ Breastfeeding and the Maternal Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta‐Analysis of Cohort Studies.” Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases 24, no. 2: 107– 115. 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.10.028. 24439841 · DOI
  4. Bellamy, L., J.‐P. Casas, A. D. Hingorani, and D. Williams. 2009. “ Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Lancet 373, no. 9677: 1773– 1779. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. 19465232 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Benton, M., J. Bird, S. Pawlby, and K. Ismail. 2023. “ The Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Perceived Mother‐Infant Bonding: A Qualitative Study.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 43, no. 2: 1– 14. 10.1080/02646838.2023.2239834. PMC11854049 37493446 · DOI
  6. Benton, M., M. Davies, K. Ismail, and J. Lenzi. 2023. “ Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Impact on the Mother‐Infant Relationship: A Cohort Study in the Postnatal Period.” Preventive Medicine Reports 34: 102270. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102270. 37334211 PMC10272488 · DOI
  7. Benton, M., N. Hotung, J. Bird, K. Ismail, and S. A. Silverio. 2024. “ The (Un)Controlled Body: A Grounded Theory Analysis to Conceptualise Stigma for Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.” Journal of Health Psychology 30, no. 5: 13591053241241863. 10.1177/13591053241241863. PMC11977814 38628073 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Benton, M., B. Jessica, P. Susan, and K. Ismail. 2025. “ The Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Perceived Mother‐Infant Bonding: A Qualitative Study.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 43, no. 2: 487– 500. 10.1080/02646838.2023.2239834. 37493446 PMC11854049 · DOI
  9. Benton, M., S. A. Silverio, and K. Ismail. 2023. “ It Feels like Medically Promoted Disordered Eating”: The Psychosocial Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Perinatal Period.” PLoS One 18, no. 7: e0288395. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288395. 37478148 PMC10361484 · DOI
  10. Berger, R. 2013. “ Now I See it, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 15, no. 2: 219– 234. 10.1177/1468794112468475. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brown, N. 2018. Video‐Conference Interviews: Ethical and Methodological Concerns in the Context of Health Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781526441812. · DOI
  12. Buchanan, T. A., A. H. Xiang, K. A. Page, and R. M. Watanabe. 2025. “ What is Gestational Diabetes‐Really?” Diabetes 74, no. 7: 1037– 1046. 10.2337/dbi24-0041. 40197830 PMC12185965 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chowdhury, R., B. Sinha, M. J. Sankar, et al. 2015. “ Breastfeeding and Maternal Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and meta‐analysis.” Supplement, Acta Paediatrica 104, no. S467: 96– 113. 10.1111/apa.13102. 26172878 PMC4670483 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Craig, L., R. Sims, P. Glasziou, and R. Thomas. 2020. “ Women’s Experiences of a Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20, no. 1: 76. 10.1186/s12884-020-2745-1. 32028931 PMC7006162 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dasgupta, K., H. Terkildsen Maindal, K. Kragelund Nielsen, and S. O'Reilly. 2018. “ Achieving Penetration and Participation in Diabetes After Pregnancy Prevention Interventions Following Gestational Diabetes: A Health Promotion Challenge.” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 145: 200– 213. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.016. 29684615 · DOI
  16. Dennison, R. A., R. J. Ward, S. J. Griffin, and J. A. Usher‐Smith. 2019. “ Women's Views on Lifestyle Changes to Reduce the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes After Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Qualitative Synthesis and Recommendations for Practice.” Diabetic Medicine 36, no. 6: 702– 717. 10.1111/dme.13926. 30723968 PMC6563496 · DOI
  17. Diane, F., S. Mark, B. Maria, et al. 2017. “ Treatments for Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” BMJ Open 7, no. 6: e015557. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015557. PMC5734427 28647726 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dodgson, J. E. 2019. “ Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Human Lactation 35, no. 2: 220– 222. 10.1177/0890334419830990. 30849272 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dunne, P., D. Sherry, and S. L. O’Reilly. 2024. “ Diabetes Prevention After Gestational Diabetes: Challenges and Opportunities.” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society: 1– 12. 10.1017/S0029665124007456. 39523873 · DOI
  20. Hod, M., A. Kapur, D. A. Sacks, et al. 2015. “ The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Pragmatic Guide for Diagnosis, Management, and Care.” Supplement, International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics 131, no. S3: S173– S211. 10.1016/s0020-7292(15)30033-3. 29644654 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Holt, A. 2010. “ Using the Telephone for Narrative Interviewing: A Research Note.” Qualitative Research 10, no. 1: 113– 121. 10.1177/1468794109348686. · DOI
  22. Horta, B. L., C. Loret de Mola, and C. G. Victora. 2015. “ Long‐Term Consequences of Breastfeeding on Cholesterol, Obesity, Systolic Blood Pressure and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Acta Paediatrica 104, no. 467: 30– 37. 10.1111/apa.13133. 26192560 · DOI
  23. Kaptoge, S., S. R. K. Seshasai, L. Sun, et al. 2023. “ Life Expectancy Associated With Different Ages at Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in High‐Income Countries: 23 Million Person‐Years of Observation.” Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 11, no. 10: 731– 742. 10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00223-1. 37708900 PMC7615299 · DOI
  24. Lau, H. W. R., J. Dong, T. Weir, et al. 2023. “ Improving Women's Experiences With Gestational Diabetes From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds in Australia: A Qualitative Study.” Frontiers in Public Health 11: 1291347. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1291347. 38292381 PMC10826118 · DOI
  25. Levers, M.‐J. D. 2013. “ Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence.” Sage Open 3, no. 4: 2158244013517243. 10.1177/2158244013517243. · DOI
  26. Ley, S. H., J. E. Chavarro, M. Li, et al. 2020. “ Lactation Duration and Long‐Term Risk for Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.” Diabetes Care 43, no. 4: 793– 798. 10.2337/dc19-2237. 32041900 PMC7085808 · DOI
  27. Li, G., P. Zhang, J. Wang, et al. 2008. “ The Long‐Term Effect of Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: A 20‐Year Follow‐Up Study.” Lancet 371, no. 9626: 1783– 1789. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60766-7. 18502303 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Li, N., Y. Yang, D. Cui, et al. 2021. “ Effects of Lifestyle Intervention on Long‐Term Risk of Diabetes in Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Obesity Reviews 22, no. 1: e13122. 10.1111/obr.13122. 33316148 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lindström, J., P. Ilanne‐Parikka, M. Peltonen, et al. 2006. “ Sustained Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes by Lifestyle Intervention: Follow‐Up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.” Lancet 368, no. 9548: 1673– 1679. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69701-8. 17098085 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lo Iacono, V., P. Symonds, and D. H. K. Brown. 2016. “ Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews.” Sociological Research Online 21, no. 2: 103– 117. 10.5153/sro.3952. · DOI
  31. Murray, S. R., and R. M. Reynolds. 2020. “ Short‐ and Long‐Term Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes and Its Treatment on Fetal Development.” Prenatal Diagnosis 40, no. 9: 1085– 1091. 10.1002/pd.5768. 32946125 · DOI
  32. Nairn, S. 2012. “ A Critical Realist Approach to Knowledge: Implications for Evidence‐Based Practice in and Beyond Nursing.” Nursing Inquiry 19, no. 1: 6– 17. 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00566.x. 22212366 · DOI
  33. National Institute of Health Care Excellence. 2015. Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management From Preconception to the Postnatal Period. NICE. 32212588
  34. Neale, B. 2016. “ What is Qualitative Longitudinal Research?” In What is Qualitative Longitudinal Research?, edited by B. Neale. 1 ed. Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b‐9781472532992.
  35. Neale, B. 2020. Qualitative Longitudinal Research: Research Methods. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  36. Neven, A. C. H., A. J. Lake, A. Williams, et al. 2022. “ Barriers to and Enablers of Postpartum Health Behaviours Among Women From Diverse Cultural Backgrounds With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework.” Diabetic Medicine 39, no. 11: e14945. 10.1111/dme.14945. 36004677 PMC9826483 · DOI
  37. Nguyen, P. T. H., N. M. Pham, K. T. Chu, D. Van Duong, and D. Van Do. 2019. “ Gestational Diabetes and Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review.” Asia‐Pacific Journal of Public Health 31, no. 3: 183– 198. 10.1177/1010539519833497. 30832484 · DOI
  38. Palinkas, L. A., S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. “ Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42, no. 5: 533– 544. 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. 24193818 PMC4012002 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Pham, S., K. Churruca, L. A. Ellis, and J. Braithwaite. 2022. “ A Scoping Review of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Healthcare: Experiences of Care Reported by Pregnant Women Internationally.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 22, no. 1: 627. 10.1186/s12884-022-04931-5. 35941555 PMC9361509 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Retnakaran, M., L. V. Viana, and C. K. Kramer. 2023. “ Lifestyle Intervention for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 25, no. 5: 1196– 1202. 10.1111/dom.14966. 36594235 · DOI
  41. Silverio, S. A., K. S. Sheen, A. Bramante, et al. 2022. “ Sensitive, Challenging, and Difficult Topics: Experiences and Practical Considerations for Qualitative Researchers.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21: 16094069221124739. 10.1177/16094069221124739. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Simmons, D., Y. Gupta, T. L. Hernandez, et al. 2024. “ Call to Action for a Life Course Approach.” Lancet 404, no. 10448: 193– 214. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00826-2. 38909623 · DOI
  43. Taghipour, A. 2014. “ Adopting Constructivist Versus Objectivist Grounded Theory in Health Care Research: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health 2, no. 2: 100– 104. 10.22038/jmrh.2014.2434. · DOI
  44. Tarrant, M., R. Chooniedass, H. S. L. Fan, K. Del Buono, and S. Masina. 2020. “ Breastfeeding and Postpartum Glucose Regulation Among Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Human Lactation 36, no. 4: 723– 738. 10.1177/0890334420950259. 32877291 · DOI
  45. Van Ryswyk, E., P. Middleton, E. Shute, W. Hague, and C. Crowther. 2015. “ Women's Views and Knowledge Regarding Healthcare Seeking for Gestational Diabetes in the Postpartum Period: A Systematic Review of Qualitative/Survey Studies.” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 110, no. 2: 109– 122. 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.09.010. 26421361 · DOI
  46. Victora, C. G., R. Bahl, A. J. Barros, et al. 2016. “ Breastfeeding in the 21st Century: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Lifelong Effect.” Lancet 387, no. 10017: 475– 490. 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7. 26869575 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Vounzoulaki, E., K. Khunti, S. C. Abner, B. K. Tan, M. J. Davies, and C. L. Gillies. 2020. “ Progression to Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a Known History of Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Review and meta‐analysis.” BMJ 369: m1361. 10.1136/bmj.m1361. 32404325 PMC7218708 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wilson, C. A., J. Newham, J. Rankin, et al. 2020. “ Is There an Increased Risk of Perinatal Mental Disorder in Women With Gestational Diabetes? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Diabetic Medicine 37, no. 4: 602– 622. 10.1111/dme.14170. 31693201 PMC7154542 · DOI
  49. Xu, N., X. Han, S. Chen, J. Zhang, and P. Gu. 2023. “ Self‐Reported Barriers in Self Management of Women With Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.” Nursing Open 10, no. 11: 7130– 7143. 10.1002/nop2.1988. 37700604 PMC10563407 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ye, W., C. Luo, J. Huang, C. Li, Z. Liu, and F. Liu. 2022. “ Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” BMJ 377: e067946. 10.1136/bmj-2021-067946. 35613728 PMC9131781 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benton, M., Payne, E., Waheed, N., Turner, K., Murphy, H. R., Skouteris, H., Ismail, K., & Silverio, S. A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Benton, Madeleine
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
e70038-e70038
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
DOI
10.1002/mpr.70038
PMC
PMC12426312
OpenAlex
W4414149102
Cited by
0
References
6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR304430)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, women's experiences, psychosocial needs, health care utilization, prenatal care, postpartum care, perinatal period, diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review