The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three‐dimensional subzone‐based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography
Open accessAbstract
Accurate characterization of harmonic tissue motion for realistic tissue geometries and property distributions requires knowledge of the full three‐dimensional displacement field because of the asymmetric nature of both the boundaries of the tissue domain and the location of internal mechanical heterogeneities. The implications of this for magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) are twofold. First, for MRE methods which require the measurement of a harmonic displacement field within the tissue region of interest, the presence of 3D motion effects reduces or eliminates the possibility that simpler, lower‐dimensional motion field images will capture the true dynamics of the entire stimulated tissue. Second, MRE techniques that exploit model‐based elastic property reconstruction methods will not be able to accurately match the observed displacements unless they are capable of accounting for 3D motion effects. These two factors are of key importance for MRE techniques based on linear elasticity models to reconstruct mechanical tissue property distributions in biological samples. This article demonstrates that 3D motion effects are present even in regular, symmetric phantom geometries and presents the development of a 3D reconstruction algorithm capable of discerning elastic property distributions in the presence of such effects. The algorithm allows for the accurate determination of tissue mechanical properties at resolutions equal to that of the MR displacement image in complex, asymmetric biological tissue geometries. Simulation studies in a realistic 3D breast geometry indicate that the process can accurately detect 1‐cm diameter hard inclusions with 2.5× elasticity contrast to the surrounding tissue. Magn Reson Med 45:827–837, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast
Van Houten, E. E. W., Doyley, M. M., Kennedy, F. E., Weaver, J. B., & Paulsen, K. D. (2003) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.10232 · Cited by 224
Self-citationGeneral review of magnetic resonance elastography
Low, G. (2016) · World Journal of Radiology · doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.59 · Cited by 123
Brain mechanical property measurement using MRE with intrinsic activation
Weaver, J. B., Pattison, A. J., McGarry, M. D., Perreard, I. M., Swienckowski, J. G., Eskey, C. J., Lollis, S. S., & Paulsen, K. D. (2012) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7275 · Cited by 102
Self-citationTest-retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas
An, H., Shi, Y., Guo, Q., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.014 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Houten, E. E. W., Miga, M. I., Weaver, J. B., Kennedy, F. E., & Paulsen, K. D.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-16
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 827-837
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2148571366
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional subzone‐based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1111
- The paper
- Van Houten, E. E. W., Miga, M. I., Weaver, J. B., Kennedy, F. E., & Paulsen, K. D. (2001). Three‐dimensional subzone‐based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.