The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents
Abstract
The bulk magnetic susceptibility (BMS) shift of a nuclear resonance frequency caused by a paramagnetic compound is of importance in in vivo NMR, both magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. However, since it is a rather complicated phenomenon, it has been the source of many misinterpretations in the literature. We have reworked and organized the theory of the BMS shift. This includes accounting for the important effects of local susceptibility. We have conducted experiments on phantom samples in order to illustrate the principles involved. Our phantoms consist of capillaries and coaxial cylinders. They simulate the situations of blood vessels oriented parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field and the interstitial spaces surrounding them. In most of our experiments, the paramagnetic compound was one of several different hyperfine shift reagents for cation resonances. These were chosen to cover a range of potencies, in both magnitude and sign, of the shifts they produce. However, we also used a reagent which was incapable of inducing a hyperfine shift and thus could cause only a BMS shift. Although we report only 23 Na spectra in this paper, the latter samples simulate the cases where one observes the water 1 H resonance in experiments employing hyperfine shift reagents for cations. There have been a number of such investigations recently reported in the literature. The principles considered in this paper allow us to offer new interpretations for the results of several experiments published in the last few years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evans, D. F. (1959) · Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) · doi:10.1039/jr9590002003 · Cited by 2,777
Paramagnetic metal complexes as water proton relaxation agents for NMR imaging: theory and design
Lauffer, R. B. (1987) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00081a003 · Cited by 1,978
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
Tobias, M. (1961) · Nuclear Science and Engineering · doi:10.13182/nse61-a15616 · Cited by 1,444
Maricq, M. M., & Waugh, J. S. (1979) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.437915 · Cited by 1,305
Villringer, A., Rosen, B. R., Belliveau, J. W., Ackerman, J. L., Lauffer, R. B., Buxton, R. B., Chao, Y., Wedeenand, V. J., & Brady, T. J. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910060205 · Cited by 706
Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging
Lüdeke, K. M., Röschmann, P., & Tischler, R. (1985) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(85)90397-2 · Cited by 445
Gillis, P., & Koenig, S. H. (1987) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910050404 · Cited by 353
Water diffusion permeability of erythrocytes using an NMR technique
Conlon, T., & Outhred, R. (1972) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0005-2736(72)90256-8 · Cited by 272
The Time Average Magnetic Field at the Nucleus in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments
Dickinson, W. C. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.81.717 · Cited by 270
Interpretation of water nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times in heterogeneous systems
Glasel, J. A., & Lee, K. H. (1974) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00811a003 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging
Haacke, E. M., Cheng, N. Y. C., House, M. J., Liu, Q., Neelavalli, J., Ogg, R. J., Khan, A., Ayaz, M., Kirsch, W., & Obenaus, A. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 · Cited by 995
Schweser, F., Deistung, A., Lehr, B. W., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.070 · Cited by 710
Measurement of intracellular triglyceride stores by H spectroscopy: validation in vivo
Szczepaniak, L. S., Babcock, E. E., Schick, F., Dobbins, R. L., Garg, A., Burns, D. K., McGarry, J. D., & Stein, D. T. (1999) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.5.e977 · Cited by 688
Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions
Haacke, E. M., Liu, S., Buch, S., Zheng, W., Wu, D., & Ye, Y. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.09.004 · Cited by 511
Lanthanide induced shifts and relaxation rate enhancements
Peters, J. A., Huskens, J., & Raber, D. J. (1996) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0079-6565(95)01026-2 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, K. ‐. C., Xu, Y., Balschi, J. A., & Springer, C. S.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-262
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2124120793
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910130207
- The paper
- Chu, K. ‐. C., Xu, Y., Balschi, J. A., & Springer, C. S. (1990). Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910130207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
