Cited by 511Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions

Haacke, E. Mark, Liu, Saifeng, Buch, Sagar, Zheng, Weili, Wu, Dongmei, Ye, Yongquan·2015·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a new technique for quantifying magnetic susceptibility. It has already found various applications in quantifying in vivo iron content, calcifications and changes in venous oxygen saturation. The accuracy of susceptibility mapping is dependent on several factors. In this review, we evaluate the entire process of QSM from data acquisition to individual data processing steps. We also show preliminary results of several new concepts introduced in this review in an attempt to improve the quality and accuracy for certain steps. The uncertainties in estimating susceptibility differences using susceptibility maps, phase images, and T2* maps are analyzed and compared. Finally, example clinical applications are presented. We conclude that QSM holds great promise in quantifying iron and becoming a standard clinical tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2014.09.004

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haacke, E. M., Liu, S., Buch, S., Zheng, W., Wu, D., & Ye, Y.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • East China Normal University (CN)
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008602421
Cited by
511
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 20
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (99472)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center
  • Medical Research and Materiel Command (W81XWH-12-1-0522)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
quantitative susceptibility mapping, calcification quantification, venous oxygen saturation, phase images, clinical application
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Diagnostic Imaging, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Anisotropy, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mice, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Magnetic Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review