The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance
Abstract
The diffusion characteristics of water in brain white matter were studied in patients with benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), and also in normal controls. In the MS patients, both lesions and normal‐appearing white matter (NAWM) were examined to assess whether pathological differences might be evident from the diffusion behavior. A volume‐selective technique was used to reduce data acquisition time and improve the reliability and precision of the measurements. This also allowed the time‐dependence of apparent diffusion coefficients to be assessed. While lesions from both patient groups showed an elevated diffusion coefficient, no differences between the two groups were found. In addition, NAWM was elevated for both patient groups compared with the control group, although this was only statistically significant for patients with a benign disease course. The degree of elevation of the diffusion coefficient within the individual lesions measured was not related to the disability of the patient. Pathological differences between lesions in patients with different disease courses, if they exist, have not been detected in this study of brain water diffusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
The longstanding MS lesion. A quantitative MRI and electron microscopic study
BARNES, D., MUNRO, P. M. G., YOUL, B. D., PRINEAS, J. W., & MCDONALD, W. I. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.3.1271 · Cited by 256
Beaulieu, C., & Allen, P. S. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320506 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain
Schaefer, P. W., Grant, P. E., & Gonzalez, R. G. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 · Cited by 1,052
Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis
Werring, D. J., Clark, C. A., Barker, G. J., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.52.8.1626 · Cited by 621
Self-citationApplications of diffusion‐weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases – a review
Horsfield, M. A., & Jones, D. K. (2002) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.787 · Cited by 468
Self-citationInvestigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations
Ciccarelli, O., Werring, D. J., Wheeler–Kingshott, C. A. M., Barker, G. J., Parker, G. J. M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.7.926 · Cited by 349
Self-citationWerring, D. J. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.8.1667 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Horsfield, M. A., Lai, M., Webb, S. L., Barker, G. J., Tofts, P. S., Turner, R., Rudge, P., & Miller, D. H.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-400
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2135712563
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910360310
- The paper
- Horsfield, M. A., Lai, M., Webb, S. L., Barker, G. J., Tofts, P. S., Turner, R., Rudge, P., & Miller, D. H. (1996). Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910360310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.