The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiecho water‐fat separation and simultaneous R estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling
Open accessAbstract
Multiecho chemical shift–based water‐fat separation methods are seeing increasing clinical use due to their ability to estimate and correct for field inhomogeneities. Previous chemical shift‐based water‐fat separation methods used a relatively simple signal model that assumes both water and fat have a single resonant frequency. However, it is well known that fat has several spectral peaks. This inaccuracy in the signal model results in two undesired effects. First, water and fat are incompletely separated. Second, methods designed to estimate T in the presence of fat incorrectly estimate the T decay in tissues containing fat. In this work, a more accurate multifrequency model of fat is included in the iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) water‐fat separation and simultaneous T estimation techniques. The fat spectrum can be assumed to be constant in all subjects and measured a priori using MR spectroscopy. Alternatively, the fat spectrum can be estimated directly from the data using novel spectrum self‐calibration algorithms. The improvement in water‐fat separation and T estimation is demonstrated in a variety of in vivo applications, including knee, ankle, spine, breast, and abdominal scans. Magn Reson Med 60:1122–1134, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantification of liver fat using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Thomsen, C., Becker, U., Winkler, K., Christoffersen, P., Jensen, M., & Henriksen, O. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(94)92543-7 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Noureddin, M., Lam, J., Peterson, M. R., Middleton, M., Hamilton, G., Le, T.-A., Bettencourt, R., Changchien, C., Brenner, D. A., Sirlin, C., et al. (2013) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.26455 · Cited by 550
Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging
Bley, T. A., Wieben, O., François, C. J., Brittain, J. H., & Reeder, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21895 · Cited by 372
Self-citationDual‐echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times
Eggers, H., Brendel, B., Duijndam, A., & Herigault, G. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22578 · Cited by 320
Quantification of liver fat content with CT and MRI: state of the art
Starekova, J., Hernando, D., Pickhardt, P. J., & Reeder, S. B. (2021) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204288 · Cited by 320
Estimation of Hepatic Proton-Density Fat Fraction by Using MR Imaging at 3.0 T
Yokoo, T., Shiehmorteza, M., Hamilton, G., Wolfson, T., Schroeder, M. E., Middleton, M. S., Bydder, M., Gamst, A. C., Kono, Y., Kuo, A., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.10100659 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., Shimakawa, A., McKenzie, C. A., Brodsky, E., Brittain, J. H., & Reeder, S. B.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-27
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1122-1134
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2088764776
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.