Cited by 83Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

On the inherent precision of mcDESPOT

Open access
Lankford, Christopher L., Does, Mark D.·2013·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

A statistical analysis of the mcDESPOT protocol for characterizing two exchanging water proton pools—a seven‐dimensional problem that fits to multiple flip angle measurements of both spoiled and refocused gradient echoes—is presented. Theoretical calculations of the Cramér‐Rao lower bounds of the variance of fitted model parameters were made using a variety of model system parameters, meant to mimic those expected in human white matter. The results, validated by Monte Carlo simulations, indicated that mcDESPOT signals acquired at feasibly attainable signal‐to‐noise ratios cannot provide parameter estimates with useful levels of precision. Precision can be greatly improved by constraining solutions with a priori model information, although this will generally lead to biased parameter estimates with less specificity. These results indicate that previous, apparently successful applications of mcDESPOT to human white matter may have used data fitting methods that implicitly constrained parameter solutions, or that the two‐pool model of white matter may not be sufficient to describe the observed water proton signal in mcDESPOT acquisitions. In either case, mcDESPOT‐derived estimates of two‐pool model parameters cannot yet be unambiguously related to specific tissue characteristics. Magn Reson Med, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.24241

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mcDESPOT determines the myelin water fraction and assesses white-matter myelination more directly than traditional diffusion-weighted imaging, but depends on acquisition protocol and modelling assumptions.

    “This method assesses white-matter myelination more directly than does traditional diffusion-weighted imaging, but is dependent on acquisition protocol and modelling assumptions5,233,5, 234.”
  • The T1 quantification method used here has been criticized for inaccuracies from RF field inhomogeneities.

    “The method we used to quantify T1 has been recently criticized as suffering from inaccuracies due to RF field inhomogeneities (Lankford and Does, 2013; Stikov et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Mädler B AL M In-vivo 3D Multi-component T2-Relaxation Measurements for Quantitative Myelin Water Imaging at 3T Proceedings of the 11th scientific meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2006 Seattle 2112
  2. [26]Golub GH van Loan CF Matrix Computations 1996 3rd Ed. The Johns Hopkins University Press 81
  3. [36]Zhang F The Schur Complement and Its Applications (Numerical Methods and Algorithms) 2005 1st ed. Springer 186

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lankford, C. L., & Does, M. D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Does, Mark D.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-12
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
127-136
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2044068102
Cited by
83
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (EB001744)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
Cramer-Rao lower bound, parameter estimation precision, two-pool model, white matter, spoiled gradient echo, parameter bias, human brain
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Myelin Sheath, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review