The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations
Abstract
Note: This study investigated six dimensions of effective board performance, as suggested by Chait, Holland, and Taylor (1991), in relation to three theoretical explanations (agency theory, resource dependency theory, and group/decision process theory) of how board governance activities potentially influence organizational performance. Survey research findings revealed that strategic contributions from the board are more robust in organizations with higher financial performance. In addition, organizations that are judged to be higher performing also reported having high-performing boards across all dimensions. In particular, the interpersonal dimension provided a unique explanation of judgments of organizational performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prentice, C. R. (2016) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764015595722 · Cited by 107
Determinants of sustainability and organisational effectiveness in non-profit organisations
Iwu, C., Kapondoro, L., Twum-Darko, M., & Tengeh, R. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7079560 · Cited by 56
Nonprofit capacity and social performance: Mapping the field and future directions
Nordin, N., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2 · Cited by 52
Park, Y. J., & Matkin, D. S. T. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13269 · Cited by 34
Wright, N. S., & Reames, T. G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12124986 · Cited by 21
Checks and balances? Leadership configurations and governance practices of NGOs in Chile
Diaz, D. A., & Rees, C. J. (2020) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-08-2019-0327 · Cited by 14
Willems, E. L., Van Puyvelde, S., Jegers, M., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2022) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12421 · Cited by 11
How can nonprofit boards innovate for growth? An integrative‐systematic review
Richardson, S., Kelly, S. J., & Gillespie, N. (2023) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21563 · Cited by 7
Tirana, I., & McCarthy, K. (2020) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(20)30134-4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, W. A.
- Venue
- Nonprofit Management and Leadership
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-339
- ISSN
- 1048-6682 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-7854
- OpenAlex
- W2062422471
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
