Cited by 294Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internalizing Weight Stigma: Prevalence and Sociodemographic Considerations in US Adults

Open access

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the presence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates of weight bias internalization (WBI) across three distinct samples of US adults. Methods: Levels of WBI were compared in (1) a sample of adults with obesity and heightened risk of weight stigma ( N = 456), (2) an online community sample ( N = 519), and (3) a national online panel ( N = 2,529). Samples 2 and 3 comprised adults with and without obesity. Participants completed identical self‐report measures, including demographic variables and weight‐related factors, to determine their relationship with low, mean, and high levels of WBI. Results: At least 44% of adults across samples endorsed mean levels of WBI (as determined by sample 3). The highest levels of WBI were endorsed by approximately one in five adults in the general population samples and by 52% in the sample of adults with obesity. Individuals with the highest WBI were white, had less education and income, were currently trying to lose weight, and had higher BMIs, higher self‐perceived weight, and previous experiences of weight stigma (especially teasing). Conclusions: Internalized weight bias is prevalent among women and men and across body weight categories. Findings provide a foundation to better understand characteristics of individuals who are at risk for internalizing weight bias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22029

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 40-50% of US adults with overweight and obesity experience internalized weight bias, and about 20% experience it at high levels.

    “Estimates from a 2018 study suggest that approximately 40–50% of US adults with overweight and obesity experience internalized weight bias, and about 20% of US adults experience this at high levels14.”

    From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that at least 44% of adults across the three samples endorsed mean levels of weight bias internalization, and approximately one in five adults in the general-population samples endorsed high levels. The 44% figure is not an estimate specifically for adults with overweight and obesity; the paper also reports high levels in 52% of its selected sample of adults with obesity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Internalized weight bias is present across diverse body-weight categories, especially among individuals with higher BMI who are trying to lose weight.

    “Internalized weight bias is present in individuals across diverse body-weight categories, but especially among individuals with higher BMI who are trying to lose weight14.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1038/ijo.2015.32 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s13679-015-0153-z · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070048 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.03.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.023 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096977 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/oby.2008.448 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.09.005 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10865-012-9402-8 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086303 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.032 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.015 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/oby.21716 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/21662630.2013.794523 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.08.014 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.03.005 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/oby.20561 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.033 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11695-014-1455-z · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF03327805 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.01.008 · DOI
  25. 10.1159/000345931 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/osp4.101 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.06.006 · DOI
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, Defining adult overweight and obesity
  30. 10.1038/ijo.2010.194 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.400 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.03.002 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/21662630.2015.1047881 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ehb.2011.07.002 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/oby.20438 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.11.001 · DOI
  37. 10.2196/jmir.2909 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/oby.2009.353 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165566 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S1352465813000763 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Quinn, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Puhl, Rebecca M.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-30
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
167-175
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2765859988
Cited by
294
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18
FWCI
19.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rudd Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight bias internalization, weight stigma, sociodemographic correlates, prevalence, weight-related teasing, body mass index, weight loss attempts, weight perception, online communities, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Prevalence, Overweight, Sociological Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review