Cited by 381Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Internalized Societal Attitudes Moderate the Impact of Weight Stigma on Avoidance of Exercise

Open access
Vartanian, Lenny R., Novak, Sarah A.·2011·Obesity

Abstract

Experiences with weight stigma negatively impact both psychological outcomes (e.g., body dissatisfaction, depression) and behavioral outcomes (e.g., dieting, exercise). However, not everyone is equally affected by experiences with weight stigma. This study examined whether internalized societal attitudes about weight moderated the impact of weight stigma. Adult participants (n = 111) completed measures of experiences with weight stigma, as well as two indexes of internalized societal attitudes (the moderators): Internalized anti‐fat attitudes and internalization of societal standards of attractiveness. Psychological outcomes included self‐esteem, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, and bulimic symptoms; behavioral outcomes included avoidance of exercise and self‐reported exercise behavior. Weight stigma was positively correlated with body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, and bulimic symptoms, and was negatively correlated with state and trait self‐esteem. Both indexes of internalized attitudes moderated the association between weight stigma and avoidance of exercise: Individuals high in anti‐fat attitudes and high in internalization of societal standards of attractiveness were more motivated to avoid exercise if they also experienced a high degree of weight stigma; individuals low in anti‐fat attitudes and low in internalization were relatively unaffected. Avoidance of exercise was negatively correlated with self‐reported strenuous exercise. These findings suggest that weight stigma can negatively influence motivation to exercise, particularly among individuals who have internalized societal attitudes about weight. Reducing internalization might be a means of minimizing the negative impact of weight stigma and of facilitating healthy weight management efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2010.234

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight stigma and the body shame it produces reduce motivation for diabetes prevention behaviors and influence many health outcomes.

    “Weight stigma and resultant body shame decrease motivation for engaging in diabetes prevention behaviors (e.g., physical activity) and impact numerous health outcomes (Vartanian & Novak, 2011).”

    From A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Informed Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Body Shame and Distress. (2025) · cites this paper as Vartanian & Novak, 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links weight stigma to greater exercise avoidance and to negative psychological outcomes, including body dissatisfaction. It does not establish that resultant body shame causes reduced motivation, study diabetes prevention specifically, or demonstrate effects on numerous health outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weight-focused prevention approaches can foster avoidance of risk-reducing behaviors such as exercise.

    “and foster avoidance of risk-reducing behaviors (e.g., exercise; Vartanian & Novak, 2011)—driven by body shame following intervention-related weight stigma (e.g., Todd, 2007).”

    From A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Informed Diabetes Prevention Program Reduces Body Shame and Distress. (2025) · cites this paper as Vartanian & Novak, 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that adults who experienced more frequent weight stigma also reported greater avoidance of exercise and exercise-related situations. It does not establish that weight-focused prevention approaches caused that stigma or the avoidance; the study examined reported stigma experiences, not prevention interventions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Myers RS, Roth DL. Perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise and stage of exercise adoption in young adults. Health Psychol 1997;16:277-283.
  2. Tappe MK, Duda JL, Ehrnwald PM. Perceived barriers to exercise among adolescents. J Sch Health 1989;59:153-155.
  3. Puhl R, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res 2001;9:788-805.
  4. Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Costanzo PR et al. Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: relation to psychological functioning in obese adults. Obes Res 2005;13:907-916.
  5. Myers A, Rosen JC. Obesity stigmatization and coping: relation to mental health symptoms, body image, and self-esteem. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:221-230.
  6. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:1802-1815.
  7. Haines J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Eisenberg ME, Hannan PJ. Weight teasing and disordered eating behaviors in adolescents: longitudinal findings from Project EAT (Eating Among Teens). Pediatrics 2006;117:e209-e215.
  8. 1930739x, 2011, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2010.234, Wiley Online Library on [20/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
  9. Zabinski MF, Saelens BE, Stein RI, Hayden-Wade HA, Wilfley DE. Overweight children's barriers to and support for physical activity. Obes Res 2003;11:238-246.
  10. Hayden-Wade HA, Stein RI, Ghaderi A et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and correlates of teasing experiences among overweight children vs. non- overweight peers. Obes Res 2005;13:1381-1392.
  11. Schmalz DL. 'I feel fat': weight-related stigma, body esteem, and BMI as predictors of perceived competence in physical activity. Obes Facts 2010;3:15-21.
  12. Vartanian LR, Shaprow JG. Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior: a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J Health Psychol 2008;13:131-138.
  13. Seacat JD, Mickelson KD. Stereotype threat and the exercise/dietary health intentions of overweight women. J Health Psychol 2009;14:556-567.
  14. Crocker J, Garcia JA. Self-esteem and the stigma of obesity. In: Brownell KD, Schwartz MB, Puhl RM, Rudd L (eds). Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies. Guilford Press: New York, 2005, pp 165-174.
  15. Latner JD, Wilson GT, Jackson ML, Stunkard AJ. Greater history of weight- related stigmatizing experience is associated with greater weight loss in obesity treatment. J Health Psychol 2009;14:190-199.
  16. Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD. The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:440-447.
  17. Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, Schwartz MB. Internalization of weight bias: Implications for binge eating and emotional well-being. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:19-23.
  18. Thompson JK, Stice E. Thin-ideal internalization: mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2001;10:181-183.
  19. Cafri G, Yamamiya Y, Brannick M, Thompson JK. The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract 2005;12:421-433.
  20. Dittmar H, Howard S. Thin-ideal internalization and social comparison tendency as moderators of media models' impact on women's body- focused anxiety. J Soc Clin Psychol 2004;23:768-791.
  21. Vartanian LR, Peter Herman C, Polivy J. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward fatness and thinness: the role of the internalization of societal standards. Body Image 2005;2:373-381.
  22. Wilson JM, Tripp DA, Boland FJ. The relative contributions of subjective and objective measures of body shape and size to body image and disordered eating in women. Body Image 2005;2:233-247.
  23. Vartanian LR. Disgust and perceived control in attitudes toward obese people. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:1302-1307.
  24. Heinberg LJ, Thompson JK, Stormer S. Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord 1995;17:81-89.
  25. Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985;10:141-146.
  26. Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Polivy J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord 1983;2:15-34.
  27. Neumark-Sztainer D, Falkner N, Story M et al. Weight-teasing among adolescents: correlations with weight status and disordered eating behaviors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:123-131.
  28. Crocker J, Cornwell B, Major B. The stigma of overweight: affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;64:60-70.
  29. Stice E, Presnell K, Gau J, Shaw H. Testing mediators of intervention effects in randomized controlled trials: an evaluation of two eating disorder prevention programs. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007;75:20-32.
  30. Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Too fat to exercise? Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000;24:331-333.
  31. Robertson N, Vohora R. Fitness vs. fatness: implicit bias towards obesity among fitness professionals and regular exercisers. Psychol Sport Exerc 2007;9:547-557.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vartanian, L. R., & Novak, S. A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Hofstra University (US)
Corresponding author
Vartanian, Lenny R.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
757-762
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2096833543
Cited by
381
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Psychological Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight stigma, exercise avoidance, self-esteem, body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, bulimic symptoms, exercise motivation, weight management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Body Weight, Bulimia, Defense Mechanisms, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Exercise, Young Adult, Social Stigma, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review