Cited by 66Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Real‐world weight‐loss effectiveness of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists among patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study

Open access
White, Gretchen E., Shu, Ingrid, Rometo, David, Arnold, Jon, Korytkowski, Mary, Luo, Jing·2023·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: Weight loss achieved with standard doses of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) agonists among real‐world patients with type 2 diabetes has not been determined. This study sought to describe the percent change in body weight 72 weeks after starting a GLP‐1 agonist. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of nonpregnant adults who were first dispensed a GLP‐1 agonist between 2011 and 2018 was conducted using electronic health record data from patients receiving care at a large health system. Linear mixed models were used, with a person‐level random intercept controlling for baseline variables associated with missing weight data to estimate percent body weight change during follow‐up. Results: The cohort included 2405 patients (mean [SD] age 48 [10] years, 53% female), with a mean BMI of 37 (8) kg/m 2 and a mean baseline weight of 238 (54) lb. Mean percent weight loss significantly increased from 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6%‐1.6%) 8 weeks after GLP‐1‐agonist dispensing to 2.2% (95% CI: 1.7%‐2.6%) 72 weeks after GLP‐1‐agonist dispensing (p value for quadratic trend < 0.001). One‐third of patients lost ≥5% body weight at 72 weeks. Conclusions: In this real‐world study of more than 2400 patients with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes, starting a GLP‐1 agonist at standard glycemic control doses was associated with modest weight loss through 72 weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.23622

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, G. E., Shu, I., Rometo, D., Arnold, J., Korytkowski, M., & Luo, J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
White, Gretchen E.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-09
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
537-544
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W4313880066
Cited by
66
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
13.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001856)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK120956)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, weight loss, overweight, real-world effectiveness, weight change, diabetes treatment
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Adult, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review