The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: a retrospective of the last decade
Open accessAbstract
In the last decade, the development of microarrays and the ability to perform massively parallel gene expression analysis of human tumours were received with great excitement by the scientific community. The promise of microarrays was of apocalyptic dimensions, with some experts envisaging that it would be a matter of a few years for this technology to replace traditional clinicopathological markers in clinical practice and treatment decision‐making. The replacement of histopathology by high‐tech and more objective approaches to cancer diagnosis, prognostication and prediction was, at that time, a foregone conclusion. Ten years after the initial publications of translational research studies using microarrays, one cannot deny that this technology has changed the way breast cancer is perceived. It has brought the concept of breast cancer heterogeneity to the forefront of cancer research, and the fact that distinct subtypes of breast cancer are completely different diseases that affect the same anatomical site. Furthermore, it has led to the development of prognostic and predictive ‘gene signatures’, which are yet to be fully incorporated into clinical practice. Importantly, though, the prognostic and predictive power of microarrays has been shown to be complementary to, rather than a replacement for, traditional clinicopathological parameters. Here we endeavour to provide a fair and balanced assessment of what microarray‐based gene expression analysis has taught us in the last decade and its contribution to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction. Copyright © 2009 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Tumors: Wounds That Do Not Heal
Flier, J. S., Underhill, L. H., & Dvorak, H. F. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198612253152606 · Cited by 4,391 · cited 1×
“Based on the analogies drawn between tumour stroma and wound healing [113], Chang and colleagues studied the transcriptomic patterns of fibroblasts’ response to serum in vitro [114], a cell type present in tumour stroma and involved in the wound-healing process.”
BackgroundTransitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits
Polyak, K., & Weinberg, R. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2620 · Cited by 3,302
Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment
Brown, J. M., & Wilson, W. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1367 · Cited by 2,828
Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations
Engelman, J. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2664 · Cited by 2,445
kConFab, Lim, E., Vaillant, F., Wu, D., Forrest, N. C., Pal, B., Hart, A. H., Asselin-Labat, M.-L., Gyorki, D. E., Ward, T., et al. (2009) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2000 · Cited by 1,492 · cited 1×
“Consistent with this observation, Lim et al demonstrated that basal-like cancers display a phenotype consistent with that of luminal progenitor cells and may originate from these cells, rather than from normal basal cells of the breast [69].”
ResultWhen mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers
Sakai, W., Swisher, E. M., Karlan, B. Y., Agarwal, M. K., Higgins, J., Friedman, C., Villegas, E., Jacquemont, C., Farrugia, D. J., Couch, F. J., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06633 · Cited by 1,086
Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2
Edwards, S. L., Brough, R., Lord, C. J., Natrajan, R., Vatcheva, R., Levine, D. A., Boyd, J., Reis-Filho, J. S., & Ashworth, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06548 · Cited by 1,011
Self-citationGlinsky, G. V., Berezovska, O., & Glinskii, A. B. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci23412 · Cited by 916
Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Allison, D. B., Ball, C. A., Coulibaly, I., Cui, X., Culhane, A. C., Falchi, M., Furlanello, C., Game, L., Jurman, G., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.295 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology
Rodríguez-Paredes, M., & Esteller, M. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2305 · Cited by 1,205
Precision medicine and radiogenomics in breast cancer: new approaches toward diagnosis and treatment
Pinker, K., Chin, J., Melsaether, A. N., Morris, E. A., & Moy, L. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172171 · Cited by 275
Gajewski, T. F., Louahed, J., & Brichard, V. G. (2010) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0b013e3181eacbd8 · Cited by 250
Applications of Connectivity Map in drug discovery and development
Qu, X. A., & Rajpal, D. K. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.07.017 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Weigelt, B., Baehner, F. L., & Reis‐Filho, J. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-19
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2050328564
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
