Cited by 241Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

HER2 overexpression and amplification as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer: analysis of 3256 patients enrolled in the QUASAR , FOCUS and PICCOLO colorectal cancer trials

Open access
Richman, Susan D, Southward, Katie, Chambers, Philip, Cross, Debra, Barrett, Jennifer, Hemmings, Gemma, Taylor, Morag, Wood, Henry +11 more·2016·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

HER2 overexpression/amplification is linked to trastuzumab response in breast/gastric cancers. One suggested anti‐ EGFR resistance mechanism in colorectal cancer ( CRC ) is aberrant MEK–AKT pathway activation through HER2 up‐regulation. We assessed HER2 ‐amplification/overexpression in stage II–III and IV CRC patients, assessing relationships to KRAS / BRAF and outcome. Pathological material was obtained from 1914 patients in the QUASAR stage II–III trial and 1342 patients in stage IV trials ( FOCUS and PICCOLO ). Tissue microarrays were created for HER2 immunohistochemistry. HER2 ‐amplification was assessed using FISH and copy number variation. KRAS / BRAF mutation status was assessed by pyrosequencing. Progression‐free survival ( PFS ) and overall survival ( OS ) data were obtained for FOCUS / PICCOLO and recurrence and mortality for QUASAR ; 29/1342 (2.2%) stage IV and 25/1914 (1.3%) stage II–III tumours showed HER2 protein overexpression. Of the HER2 ‐overexpressing cases, 27/28 (96.4%) stage IV tumours and 20/24 (83.3%) stage II–III tumours demonstrated HER2 amplification by FISH ; 41/47 (87.2%) also showed copy number gains. HER2 ‐overexpression was associated with KRAS / BRAF wild‐type ( WT ) status at all stages: in 5.2% WT versus 1.0% mutated tumours ( p < 0.0001) in stage IV and 2.1% versus 0.2% in stage II–III tumours ( p = 0.01), respectively. HER2 was not associated with OS or PFS . At stage II–III , there was no significant correlation between HER2 overexpression and 5FU / FA response. A higher proportion of HER2 ‐overexpressing cases experienced recurrence, but the difference was not significant. HER2 ‐amplification/overexpression is identifiable by immunohistochemistry, occurring infrequently in stage II–III CRC , rising in stage IV and further in KRAS / BRAF WT tumours. The value of HER2 ‐targeted therapy in patients with HER2 ‐amplified CRC must be tested in a clinical trial. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.4679

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richman, S. D., Southward, K., Chambers, P., Cross, D., Barrett, J., Hemmings, G., Taylor, M., Wood, H., Hutchins, G., Foster, J. M., Oumie, A., Spink, K. G., Brown, S. R., Jones, M., Kerr, D., Handley, K., Gray, R., Seymour, M., & Quirke, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • Affymetrix UK Ltd High Wycombe UK
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB)
  • Section of Oncology Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds UK
Corresponding author
Richman, Susan D
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
238
Issue
4
Pages
562-570
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2212171768
Cited by
241
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Yorkshire Cancer Research
  • Cancer Research UK (C37059/A11941)
  • Amgen
  • Technology Strategy Board (101032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
HER2 overexpression, HER2 amplification, colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, anti-EGFR resistance, trastuzumab, copy number gain, progression-free survival, overall survival, recurrence, HER2-targeted therapy, stage IV colorectal cancer
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review