Cited by 211Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchCancer survivorship and care

Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology

Open access
Coccia, Peter F., Altman, Jessica, Bhatia, Smita, Borinstein, Scott C., Flynn, Joseph, George, Suzanne, Goldsby, Robert, Hayashi, Robert +16 more·2012·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of death among the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population, excluding homicide, suicide, or unintentional injury. AYA patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals who are well-versed in the specific developmental issues relevant to this patient population. The recommendations for age-appropriate care outlined in these NCCN Guidelines include psychosocial assessment, a discussion of infertility risks associated with treatment and options for fertility preservation, genetic and familial risk assessment for all patients after diagnosis, screening and monitoring of late effects in AYA cancer survivors after successful completion of therapy, and palliative care and end-of-life considerations for patients for whom curative therapy fails.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0117

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceived cost and lack of sufficient time are the most frequently cited barriers to introducing palliative care concepts.

    “Perceived cost[15,44–51] and lack of sufficient time [33,37,47,51–53] are the most frequently cited barriers to introducing palliative care concepts, thus warranting consideration of reimbursement for palliative care conversations and services.”

    From Palliative Care as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology (2015) · cites this paper as [44]

    The 'Introducing palliative care' guidance (p. 16) identifies lack of communication about illness trajectory as a barrier, but does not identify perceived cost or insufficient time as barriers. The palliative-care discussion (p. 33) also does not say these are the most frequently cited barriers; searches for cost, time, and reimbursement did not establish that claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coccia, P. F., Altman, J., Bhatia, S., Borinstein, S. C., Flynn, J., George, S., Goldsby, R., Hayashi, R., Huang, M. S., Johnson, R. H., Beaupin, L. K., Link, M. P., Oeffinger, K. C., Orr, K. M., Pappo, A. S., Reed, D., Spraker, H. L., Thomas, D. A., von Mehren, M., Wechsler, D. S., Whelan, K. F., Zebrack, B. J., Sundar, H., & Shead, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Tennessee System (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2012-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1112-1150
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W2324624347
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
adolescent and young adult cancer, multidisciplinary care, psychosocial assessment, infertility risk, fertility preservation, genetic risk prediction, familial cancer risk, late effects of cancer treatment, cancer survivors, palliative care, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Medicine, Adult, Humans, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Patient Compliance, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult, Fertility Preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review