The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that there are three major prototypic patterns of personality description (resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled) in a series of studies including adults' self‐descriptions on the Big Five and parents' Big Five and Q‐Sort judgments of their children, using both replicated cluster analyses and replicated Q‐factor analyses. The consistency of the prototypes across ages, judges, and methods was quantitatively measured. The results confirmed the hypothesis in all studies. Personality, social relationship, and social interaction correlates of the prototypes indicated externalizing tendencies for undercontrollers and internalizing tendencies for overcontrollers for both children and adults. The studies provide strong evidence for a three‐prototype model of personality description at the highest level of analysis for both childhood and adulthood. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226 · Cited by 8,384
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682
Caspi, A. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830110071009 · Cited by 1,159
John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131373 · Cited by 412
Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication.
Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Cited by
Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015083 · Cited by 1,226
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dochy, F., Mouratidis, A., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Beyers, W. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002 · Cited by 542
Hayenga, A. O., & Corpus, J. H. (2010) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-010-9181-x · Cited by 345
MOFFITT, T. E., CASPI, A., HARRINGTON, H., MILNE, B. J., MELCHIOR, M., GOLDBERG, D., & POULTON, R. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706009640 · Cited by 326
Resilience and indicators of adjustment during rehabilitation from a spinal cord injury.
White, B., Driver, S., & Warren, A. M. (2010) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018451 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & Van Aken, M. A. G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-198
- ISSN
- 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0984
- OpenAlex
- W2124996490
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
