The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships
Open accessAbstract
The interplay of personality and social relationships is as fascinating as it is complex and it pertains to a wide array of largely separate research domains. Here, we present an integrative and unified framework for analysing the complex dynamics of personality and social relationships (PERSOC). Basic principles and general processes on the individual and dyadic level are outlined to show how personality and social relationships influence each other and develop over time. PERSOC stresses the importance of social behaviours and interpersonal perceptions as mediating processes organized in social interaction units. The framework can be applied to diverse social relationships such as first encounters, short–term acquaintances, friendships, relationships between working group members, educational or therapeutic settings, romantic relationships and family relationships. It has important consequences for how we conceptualize, understand, and investigate personality and social relationships. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 · Cited by 3,318
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · cited 1×
“7Structllrally similar pro ces ses are hypothesized by social-cognitive models of personality, which explain the effect of person-:sltuatlon II1teractlons on behaviOllr via the personality-dependent processll1g of sltuatlOnal 111[01mation (Caprara, Steca, Cervone, & Artistico, 2003; Cervone & Shoda, 1999; MischeI, 197…”
BackgroundPerception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments
Brunswik, E. (1956) · doi:10.1525/9780520350519 · Cited by 2,974
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 · Cited by 2,479
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479
Cited by
Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis.
Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028601 · Cited by 1,381
Self-citationNarcissistic admiration and rivalry: disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism.
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034431 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationProcesses of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559
Self-citationCramer, A. O. J., Van Der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., Kendler, K. S., & Borsboom, D. (2012) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1866 · Cited by 477
Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time.
Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000057 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J. A., Hartung, F., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Schröder–Abé, M., Vollmann, M., Wagner, J., & Wrzus, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 90-107
- ISSN
- 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0984
- OpenAlex
- W2097548880
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/per.811
- The paper
- Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J. A., Hartung, F., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Schröder–Abé, M., Vollmann, M., Wagner, J., & Wrzus, C. (2011). PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
