The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extracellular matrix regenerated: tissue engineering via electrospun biomimetic nanofibers
Abstract
While electrospinning had seen intermittent use in the textile industry from the early twentieth century, it took the explosion of the field of tissue engineering, and its pursuit of biomimetic extracellular matrix (ECM) structures, to create an electrospinning renaissance. Over the past decade, a growing number of researchers in the tissue engineering community have embraced electrospinning as a polymer processing technique that effectively and routinely produces non‐woven structures of nanoscale fibers (sizes of 80 nm to 1.5 µm). These nanofibers are of physiological significance as they closely resemble the structure and size scale of the native ECM (fiber diameters of 50 to 500 nm). Attempts to replicate the many roles of native ECM have led to the electrospinning of a wide array of polymers, both synthetic (poly(glycolic acid), poly(lactic acid), polydioxanone, polycaprolactone, etc.) and natural (collagen, fibrinogen, elastin, etc.) in origin, for a multitude of different tissue applications. With various compositions, fiber dimensions and fiber orientations, the biological, chemical and mechanical properties of the electrospun materials can be tailored. In this review we highlight the role of electrospinning in the engineering of different tissues and applications (skin/wound healing, cartilage, bone, vascular tissue, urological tissues, nerve, and ligament), and discuss its potential role in future work. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laurencin, C., Khan, Y., & El-Amin, S. F. (2006) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.3.1.49 · Cited by 716
Vaz, C. M., van Tuijl, S., Bouten, C. V. C., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.006 · Cited by 459
Applications of Polymer Nanofibers in Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Venugopal, J., & Ramakrishna, S. (2005) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:125:3:147 · Cited by 370
Ligament tissue engineering: An evolutionary materials science approach
Laurencin, C. T., & Freeman, J. W. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.073 · Cited by 304
Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications
Boland, E. D., Coleman, B. D., Barnes, C. P., Simpson, D. G., Wnek, G. E., & Bowlin, G. L. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.003 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Cited by
Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing
Mogoşanu, G. D., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2014) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015 · Cited by 1,052
Solution blow spinning: A new method to produce micro‐ and nanofibers from polymer solutions
Medeiros, E. S., Glenn, G. M., Klamczynski, A. P., Orts, W. J., & Mattoso, L. H. C. (2009) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.30275 · Cited by 780
Lowery, J. L., Datta, N., & Rutledge, G. C. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072 · Cited by 448
Applications of electrospun nanofibers
Fang, J., Niu, H., Lin, T., & Wang, X. (2008) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0319-0 · Cited by 313
Powell, H. M., & Boyce, S. T. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0473 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Sell, S., Barnes, C., Smith, M., McClure, M., Madurantakam, P., Grant, J., McManus, M., & Bowlin, G.
- Venue
- Polymer International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1349-1360
- ISSN
- 0959-8103 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0126
- OpenAlex
- W2095322441
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.