Cited by 83Potato Plant ResearchOrganic Food and AgricultureFood and Agricultural Sciences

Effects of agricultural production systems and their components on protein profiles of potato tubers

Open access
Lehesranta, Satu J., Koistinen, Kaisa M., Massat, Nathalie, Davies, Howard V., Shepherd, Louise V. T., McNicol, James W., Cakmak, Ismail, Cooper, Julia +3 more·2007·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

A range of studies have compared the level of nutritionally relevant compounds in crops from organic and nonorganic farming systems, but there is very limited information on the effect of farming systems and their key components on the protein composition of plants. We addressed this gap by quantifying the effects of different farming systems and key components of such systems on the protein profiles of potato tubers. Tuber samples were produced in the Nafferton factorial systems study, a group of long‐term, replicated factorial field experiments designed to identify and quantify the effect of fertility management methods, crop protection practices and rotational designs used in organic, low input and conventional production systems. Protein profiles were determined by 2‐DE and subsequent protein identification by HPLC‐ESI‐MS/MS. Principal component analysis of 2‐DE data showed that only fertility management practices (organic matter vs. mineral fertiliser based) had a significant effect on protein composition. Quantitative differences were detected in 160 of the 1100 tuber proteins separated by 2‐DE. Proteins identified by MS are involved in protein synthesis and turnover, carbon and energy metabolism and defence responses, suggesting that organic fertilisation leads to an increased stress response in potato tubers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200600889

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehesranta, S. J., Koistinen, K. M., Massat, N., Davies, H. V., Shepherd, L. V. T., McNicol, J. W., Cakmak, I., Cooper, J., Lück, L., Kärenlampi, S. O., & Leifert, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
597-604
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2000028940
Cited by
83
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sabanci University (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
potato tubers, organic farming, conventional farming, low-input agriculture, fertility management, organic fertilizer, mineral fertilizers, crop protection practices, crop rotation, stress response, plant defense proteins, energy metabolism proteins, protein synthesis
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Plant Proteins, Potassium, Solanum tuberosum, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Crops, Agricultural, Proteome, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Plant Tubers, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review