Cited by 24Agricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesPlant Growth Enhancement Techniques

Quantitative proteomics to study the response of potato to contrasting fertilisation regimes

Open access
Rempelos, L., Cooper, J., Wilcockson, S., Eyre, M., Shotton, P., Volakakis, N., Orr, C. H., Leifert, C. +2 more·2013·Molecular Breeding

Abstract

There is concern over the sustainability and environmental impact of mineral fertilisers and crop protection inputs used in intensive arable crop production systems. However, replacing mineral with organic fertilisers (animal and green manures) and restricting the use of chemosynthetic crop protection may significantly reduce crop yields. The effects of (a) replacing mineral with composted cattle manure fertiliser input and (b) omitting pesticide-based crop protection on potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber yield, leaf and tuber mineral nutrient content and leaf protein profiles were investigated. Switching to organic fertiliser had a greater effect on yield and protein profiles than the omission of chemosynthetic crop protection. Leaf N and P composition were significant drivers of protein expression, particularly proteins involved in photosynthesis such as the large subunit of RuBisCO, RuBisCO activase and the photosystem I reaction centre, which were at higher abundances in potato leaves grown under mineral fertiliser regimes. Proteins known to be induced in response to stress, such as dehydroascorbate reductase and Glutathione S-transferases, were also shown to be up-regulated under mineral fertilisation, possibly associated with higher Cd composition, whereas two proteins known to be involved in biotic stress (1,3-β-D-glucan glucanohydrolase; putative Kunitz-type tuber invertase inhibitor) were more abundant under compost fertilisation. Results showed that switching from mineral to organic fertilisers led to reduced N availability, a significant change in leaf protein expression and lower tuber yield. In contrast, omission of chemosynthetic crop protection inputs had limited effects on protein expression and no significant effect on tuber yield. This study provides information on the effects of changes in nutrient supply on protein expression patterns. It is a prerequisite for the development of functional molecular markers for a directed strategy to inform breeding programmes to improve potato nutrient use efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11032-012-9795-7

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rempelos, L., Cooper, J., Wilcockson, S., Eyre, M., Shotton, P., Volakakis, N., Orr, C. H., Leifert, C., Gatehouse, A. M. R., & Tétard-Jones, C.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Gatehouse, A. M. R.
Venue
Molecular Breeding
Published
2012-11-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
363-378
ISSN
  • 1380-3743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9788
OpenAlex
W4235001379
Cited by
24
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Breeding (publishedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
potato, organic fertilization, composted cattle manure, mineral fertilizers, tuber yield, photosynthesis proteins, Rubisco, stress proteins, cadmium, biotic stress, nutrient use efficiency, molecular markers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review