The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Difference gel electrophoresis
Abstract
DIGE is a protein labelling and separation technique allowing quantitative proteomics of two or more samples by optical fluorescence detection of differentially labelled proteins that are electrophoretically separated on the same gel. DIGE is an alternative to quantitation by MS‐based methodologies and can circumvent their analytical limitations in areas such as intact protein analysis, (linear) detection over a wide range of protein abundances and, theoretically, applications where extreme sensitivity is needed. Thus, in quantitative proteomics DIGE is usually complementary to MS‐based quantitation and has some distinct advantages. This review describes the basics of DIGE and its unique properties and compares it to MS‐based methods in quantitative protein expression analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B., Parker, K., Hattan, S., Khainovski, N., Pillai, S., Dey, S., Daniels, S., et al. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400129-mcp200 · Cited by 4,401
Difference gel electrophoresis. A single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts
Ünlü, M., Morgan, M. E., & Minden, J. S. (1997) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.1150181133 · Cited by 2,179
Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC
Mann, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2067 · Cited by 931
Alban, A., David, S. O., Bjorkesten, L., Andersson, C., Sloge, E., Lewis, S., & Currie, I. (2003) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200390006 · Cited by 924
Tonge, R., Shaw, J., Middleton, B., Rowlinson, R., Rayner, S., Young, J., Pognan, F., Hawkins, E., Currie, I., & Davison, M. (2001) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/1615-9861(200103)1:3<377::aid-prot377>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 901
Encyclopedia of molecular cell biology and molecular medicine
Meyers, R. A. (2004) · Cited by 613
Wu, W. W., Wang, G., Baek, S. J., & Shen, R.-F. (2006) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr050405o · Cited by 576
Cited by
Correlation of mRNA and protein in complex biological samples
Maier, T., Güell, M., & Serrano, L. (2009) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.036 · Cited by 1,802
Kim, J. Y., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, G. M. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3758-5 · Cited by 801
Integrative analysis of the heat shock response in Aspergillus fumigatus
Albrecht, D., Guthke, R., Brakhage, A. A., & Kniemeyer, O. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-32 · Cited by 105
Use of Foodomics for Control of Food Processing and Assessing of Food Safety
Josić, D., Peršurić, Ž., Rešetar, D., Martinović, T., Saftić, L., & Kraljević Pavelić, S. (2017) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2016.12.001 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Timms, J. F., & Cramer, R.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 23-24
- Pages
- 4886-4897
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2004254720
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Difference gel electrophoresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200800298
- The paper
- Timms, J. F., & Cramer, R. (2008). Difference gel electrophoresis. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
