Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomic analysis of microvesicles derived from human colorectal cancer ascites

Choi, Dong‐Sic, Park, Jung Ok, Jang, Su Chul, Yoon, Yae Jin, Jung, Jin Woo, Choi, Do‐Young, Kim, Jung‐Wook, Kang, Ji Seon, Park, Jaesung, Hwang, Daehee, Lee, Kyung‐Hee, Park, Sang‐Hyun, Kim, Yoon‐Keun, Desiderio, Dominic M., Kim, Kwang Pyo, Gho, Yong Song·2011·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

The presence of malignant ascites in the peritoneal cavity is a poor prognostic indicator of low survival rate. Various cancer cells, including those of colorectal cancer (CRC), release microvesicles (exosomes) into surrounding tissues and peripheral circulation including malignant ascites. Although recent progress has revealed that microvesicles play multiple roles in tumor progression, the protein composition and the pathological function of malignant ascites‐derived microvesicles are still unknown. Here, we report the first global proteomic analyses of highly purified microvesicles derived from human CRC ascites. With 1‐D SDS‐PAGE and nano‐LC‐MS/MS analyses, we identified a total of 846 microvesicular proteins from ascites of three CRC patients with high confidence; 384 proteins were identified in at least two patients. We identified proteins that might function in tumor progression via disruption of epithelial polarity, migration, invasion, tumor growth, immune modulation, and angiogenesis. Furthermore, we identified several potential diagnostic markers of CRC including colon‐specific surface antigens. Our proteomic analyses will help to elucidate diverse functions of microvesicles in cancer progression and will aid in the development of novel diagnostic tools for CRC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201100022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Choi, D., Park, J. O., Jang, S. C., Yoon, Y. J., Jung, J. W., Choi, D., Kim, J., Kang, J. S., Park, J., Hwang, D., Lee, K., Park, S., Kim, Y., Desiderio, D. M., Kim, K. P., & Gho, Y. S.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06
Volume
11
Issue
13
Pages
2745-2751
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W1997799423
Cited by
168
References
1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic analysis of microvesicles derived from human colorectal cancer ascites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.201100022
The paper
Choi, D., Park, J. O., Jang, S. C., Yoon, Y. J., Jung, J. W., Choi, D., Kim, J., Kang, J. S., Park, J., Hwang, D., Lee, K., Park, S., Kim, Y., Desiderio, D. M., Kim, K. P., & Gho, Y. S. (2011). Proteomic analysis of microvesicles derived from human colorectal cancer ascites. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201100022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.