Cited by 91Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Psychosocial interventions for adolescent cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature

Seitz, Diana C. M., Besier, Tanja, Goldbeck, Lutz·2009·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Both cancer diagnosis and the consequent treatment are particularly challenging for adolescent patients. Adjuvant psychological interventions to reduce cancer‐related distress are therefore a fundamental part of a multidisciplinary treatment. Assuming that psycho‐oncology has to consider developmentally specific aspects, this review summarizes empirical studies of the efficacy and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for adolescent cancer patients. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in four databases. Studies were included only if they were exclusively designed for adolescent cancer patients and incorporated a defined outcome measure to evaluate the effects of the implemented intervention. Results: Only four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One of those studies reported a significant improvement compared with a waitlist control group. The relevant gains were found in the overall level of distress, as well as in additional outcome variables such as knowledge of sexual issues, body image and anxiety about psychosexual issues. The remaining studies revealed no significant changes related to psychological distress and psychosocial functioning. Conclusion: Taken together, the findings point out that there is a lack of intervention research in psycho‐oncology with adolescents. So far, there is only limited evidence for the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to improve coping with cancer‐associated problems in adolescent patients. Future research needs to be done in this population. In order to establish more conclusive results, larger samples and interventions particularly designed for adolescent patients ought to be studied. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1473

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seitz, D. C. M., Besier, T., & Goldbeck, L.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Seitz, Diana C. M.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-19
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
683-690
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2120401844
Cited by
91
References
51
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
adolescent cancer patients, psychosocial interventions, cancer-related distress, psychological distress, coping with cancer, sexual dysfunction, body image, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Humans, Neoplasms, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Self-Help Groups, Sick Role, Treatment Outcome, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review