Cited by 39Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeEthics in Clinical Research

Treatment Setting, Clinical Trial Enrollment, and Subsequent Outcomes Among Adolescents With Cancer: A Literature Review

Open access
Tai, Eric, Buchanan, Natasha, Westervelt, Lauren, Elimam, Dena, Lawvere, Silvana·2014·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been an overall improvement in survival rates for persons with cancer over the past 35 years. However, these gains are less prevalent among adolescents with cancer aged 15 to 19 years, which may be due to lower clinical trial enrollment among adolescents with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a literature review to assess current research regarding clinical trial enrollment and subsequent outcomes among adolescents with cancer. The search included English-language publications that reported original data from January 1985 to October 2011. RESULTS: The search identified 539 records. Of these 539 records, there were 30 relevant original research articles. Multiple studies reported that adolescents with cancer are enrolled in clinical trials at lower rates compared with younger children and older adults. Treatment setting, physician type, and institution type may all be factors in the low enrollment rate among adolescents. Few data focused solely on adolescents, with many studies combining adolescents with young adults. The number of available studies related to this topic was limited, with significant variability in study design, methods, and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This literature review suggests that adolescents with cancer are not treated at optimal settings and are enrolled in clinical trials at low rates. This may lead to inferior treatment and poor subsequent medical and psychosocial outcomes. The scarcity in data further validates the need for additional research focusing on this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2014-0122c

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Press Review Group; National Cancer Institute; LiveStrong Young Adult Alliance. Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2006 NIH Publication 06-6067
  2. [17]Paulussen M, Ahrens S, Juergens HF. Cure rates in Ewing tumor patients aged over 15 years are better in pediatric oncology units: Results of GPOH CESS/EICESS studies [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003; 22(816): 3279

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tai, E., Buchanan, N., Westervelt, L., Elimam, D., & Lawvere, S.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • SciMetrika LLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Tai, Eric
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
133
Issue
Supplement_3
Pages
S91-S97
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2121542492
Cited by
39
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
adolescent cancer, clinical trial recruitment, treatment setting, institutional type, psychosocial outcomes, medical outcomes, young adult cancer, clinical trial access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review