Cited by 25Sexual function and dysfunction studiesCancer survivorship and careAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Intimacy after prostate cancer: a brief couples' workshop is associated with improvements in relationship satisfaction

Walker, Lauren M., King, Ngaire, Kwasny, Zoe, Robinson, John W.·2017·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer (PCa) treatments often leave men with erectile dysfunction (ED). Even when ED treatments are effective in restoring men's ability to have an erection sufficient for intercourse, couples continue to struggle sexually. Effective treatments to help couples recover sexually are needed. METHOD: PCa patients and partners (N = 59 couples) attending a one-time couples' intimacy workshop, participated in an evaluation. The workshop, offered eight times over a 2-year period, emphasized a couples-based approach to treatment that enhances direct communication about sexuality and implementation of sexual recovery strategies that are consistent with the couple's values. Couples completed pre and post questionnaires (at baseline and 2 months later) assessing the primary outcome of relationship adjustment (Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale) and secondary outcome of sexual function (Sexual Function Questionnaire). T-tests were employed to examine pre-post changes in scores. A small qualitative sub-study was conducted on the use of a Commitment to Change goal-setting exercise, completed during the workshop. RESULTS: Results provide insight into the specific nature of improvements. Patients and partners showed improvements in relationship satisfaction. Improvements with small-to-medium effect sizes were observed for patients and partners sexual function; however, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, these changes were no longer statistically significant. The specific goals set by couples, and their achievement status, are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop offers a comprehensive, one-session intervention to help couples implement a treatment plan to promote sexual recovery after PCa treatment. Given the observed improvements, progression to a randomized control trial is warranted. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4147

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, L. M., King, N., Kwasny, Z., & Robinson, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Walker, Lauren M.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-16
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1336-1346
ISSN
1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2364537198
Cited by
25
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Male Sexual Health Council
  • Calgary Prostate Cancer Centre
  • Prostate Cancer Canada Rising Star (RS-2015-03)
  • Markin Undergraduate Student Research Program Summer Studentship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, sexual recovery, relationship satisfaction, dyadic adjustment, sexual function, couple-based interventions, goal setting, intimacy, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coitus, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Prostatic Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sexual Partners, Treatment Outcome, Couples Therapy, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review