Cited by 51Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: a systematic review

Kedia, Satish K., Collins, Andy, Dillon, Patrick J., Akkus, Cem, Ward, Kenneth D., Jackson, Bianca M.·2020·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective Caregivers of patients with lung cancer often face physical, emotional, and financial distress, which not only negatively affects the caregivers' mental health and quality of life but may also impact patients' well-being. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the content, delivery, and efficacy of psychosocial interventions targeting caregivers of lung cancer patients. Methods Studies included in this systematic review assessed psychosocial interventions for caregivers of lung cancer patients that were published in English between January 2009 and December 2017. These interventions focused on burden, mental health, quality of life, self-efficacy, and/or coping as outcome measures. CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms (lung cancer OR lung neoplasms OR thoracic cancer) AND (caregiver OR caregiving) AND (intervention OR program) to systematically review the relevant literature on this topic. Results From the 22 studies included in this systematic review, interventions were classified into four categories: communication-based interventions, coping skills training interventions, multicomponent interventions, and stress reduction interventions. The majority of the interventions (especially communication-based and multicomponent) led to improvement, albeit not always statistically significant, in one or more outcomes; however, the most frequently reported improvements included, burden, distress,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5271

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kedia, S. K., Collins, A., Dillon, P. J., Akkus, C., Ward, K. D., & Jackson, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • Kent State University at Stark (US)
  • Baptist Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kedia, Satish K.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-24
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
251-262
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2988078366
Cited by
51
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, informal caregivers, lung cancer, caregiver burden, caregiver distress, mental health, quality of life, self-efficacy, coping, communication intervention, coping skills training, multicomponent intervention, stress reduction, caregiver education
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review