Cited by 80Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Interventions to Cancer Caregivers

Open access
Fu, Fang, Zhao, Huaijuan, Tong, Feng, Chi, Iris·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the effect of psychosocial interventions on improving QoL, depression and anxiety of cancer caregivers. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of psychosocial interventions among adult cancer caregivers published from 2011 to 2016 . PsycINFO, PubMed, Proquest, Cochrane Library, Embase, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and EBSCO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WANFANG were searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trails; psychosocial intervention to cancer caregivers; psychosocial health indicators including quality of life, depression or anxiety. Results: 21 studies out of 4666 identified abstracts met inclusion criteria, including 19 randomised controlled trails (RCTs). The intervention modes fell into the following nine categories: family connect intervention, self-determination theory-based intervention (SDT), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), emotion-focused therapy (EFT), comprehensive health enhancement support system (CHESS), FOCUS programme, existential behavioural therapy (EBT), telephone interpersonal counseling (TIP-C), problem-solving intervention (COPE). Conclusion: paired-intervention targeting self-care and interpersonal connections of caregivers and symptom management of patients is effective in improving quality of life and alleviating depression of cancer caregivers while music therapy is helpful for reducing anxiety of cancer caregivers .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00834

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions dedicated to caregivers generally had small to medium effect sizes in reducing caregiver burden, alleviating psychological symptoms, and improving caregivers coping capabilities, self-efficacy and QoL.

    “Results from two meta-analyses [20, 21] suggest that interventions dedicated to caregivers generally had small to medium effect sizes in reducing caregiver burden, alleviating psychological symptoms, and improving caregivers coping capabilities, self-efficacy and QoL.”

    From It is time to address fear of cancer recurrence in family caregivers: protocol for the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized pilot study of the online version of the Family Caregiver–Fear Of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT) (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results > Outcome measures section (page unavailable) reports improvements in quality of life, anxiety and depression, and small-to-medium effects for quality of life in some studies. It does not establish a general small-to-medium effect across all the listed outcomes, including caregiver burden, coping capabilities and self-efficacy; it also reports some nil and large effects. This paper is a systematic review rather than a meta-analysis reporting a pooled effect size. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Li M. (2014). The Qualitative Research of the Detailed Coping Performance of Family Member of Cancer Patient during the Patient's Illness. Master's thesis, Shangxi Medical University, China
  2. World Health Organization (2015). World Health Statistics. Luxembourg: WHO Press.
  3. Xia X. Y. Luo X. W. Wang Y. (2014). Source of burden and its effect on caregiver of advanced cancer patients. West China Med. J. 29, 1384– 1386. 10.7507/1002-0179.20140423 · DOI
  4. Ye T. M. Zhu M. L. (2005). Investigation of mental health of caregivers and patients of malignant gastrointestinal tumor. Chinese J. Health Psychol. 13, 38– 39. 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2005.03.014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, F., Zhao, H., Tong, F., & Chi, I.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Anhui Normal University (CN)
  • Sichuan International Studies University (CN)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Tong, Feng
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-05-23
Volume
8
Pages
834-834
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618831526
Cited by
80
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fudan University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
cancer caregivers, psychosocial interventions, quality of life, depression, anxiety, self-determination theory, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotion-focused therapy, music therapy, caregiver self-care, symptom management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review