Cited by 105Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsCancer survivorship and careSexual function and dysfunction studies

Menopausal symptoms in women with breast cancer: Prevalence and treatment preferences

Hunter, Myra S, Grunfeld, Elizabeth A, Mittal, Sangeeta, Sikka, Pooja, Ramirez, Amanda‐Jane, Fentiman, Ian, Hamed, Hisham·2004·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Menopausal symptoms are common and problematic for women receiving adjuvant treatment for breast cancer and management presents a challenge. This cross‐sectional descriptive study aimed to investigate the experience of menopausal symptoms, current management and treatment preferences of 113 patients with breast cancer. These women (who were prescribed tamoxifen and were on average 3 years post‐diagnosis) were recruited from a breast unit database. They completed the Hot Flush and Night Sweats Questionnaire (HFNSQ), the Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) and subscales of the EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 and the BR23, as well as questions about treatments. Forty‐four of this sample were also interviewed. The prevalence of hot flushes and night sweats was 80 and 72%, respectively (average 30 per week). Having more problematic hot flushes and night sweats were associated with more anxiety and sleep problems (WHQ), and with poorer emotional and social functioning and worse body image (EORTC‐QLQ‐C30). The women had used a range of treatments for menopausal symptoms but there was often no evidence for the efficacy for many of these treatments. Strongest preferences were for non‐medical treatments, particularly vitamins and herbal remedies and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). The evidence for the effectiveness of the former is weak, whereas CBT has been shown to reduce menopausal symptoms, but needs to be evaluated in a population of women who have been treated for breast cancer. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.793

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunter, M. S., Grunfeld, E. A., Mittal, S., Sikka, P., Ramirez, A., Fentiman, I., & Hamed, H.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hunter, Myra S
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
769-778
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2086725568
Cited by
105
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
menopausal symptoms, breast cancer, hot flashes, night sweats, tamoxifen, treatment preferences, anxiety, sleep disorders, body image, quality of life, cognitive behavioral therapy, herbal medicine, vitamins, adjuvant therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Choice Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review