Cited by 65COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AILong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Pediatric lung imaging features of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Nino, Gustavo, Zember, Jonathan, Sanchez‐Jacob, Ramon, Gutierrez, Maria J., Sharma, Karun, Linguraru, Marius George·2021·Pediatric Pulmonology

Abstract

Rationale: Pediatric COVID‐19 studies have been mostly restricted to case reports and small case series, which have prevented the identification of specific pediatric lung disease patterns in COVID‐19. The overarching goal of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to provide the first comprehensive summary of the findings of published studies thus far describing COVID‐19 lung imaging data in the pediatric population. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed was performed to identify studies assessing lung‐imaging features of COVID‐19 pediatric patients (0–18 years). A single‐arm meta‐analysis was conducted to obtain the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 29 articles ( n = 1026 children) based on chest computerized tomography (CT) images were included. The main results of this comprehensive analysis are as follows: (1) Over a third of pediatric patients with COVID‐19 (35.7%, 95% CI: 27.5%–44%) had normal chest CT scans and only 27.7% (95% CI: 19.9%–35.6%) had bilateral lesions. (2) The most typical pediatric chest CT findings of COVID‐19 were ground‐glass opacities (GGO) (37.2%, 95% CI: 29.3%–45%) and the presence of consolidations or pneumonic infiltrates (22.3%, 95% CI: 17.8%–26.9%). (3) The lung imaging findings in children with COVID‐19 were overall less frequent and less severe than in adult patients. (4) Typical lung imaging features of viral respiratory infections in the pediatric population such as increased perihilar markings and hyperinflation were not reported in children with COVID‐19. Conclusion: Chest CT manifestations in children with COVID‐19 could potentially be used for early identification and prompt intervention in the pediatric population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ppul.25070

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An under-represented population or age group in one hospital or region might be highly represented in another, such as children who may be differentially affected by COVID-19.

    “An under-represented population or age group in one hospital/region might be highly represented in another region, such as children, who might be differentially affected by COVID-19, including disease manifestations in lung imaging46.”
  • A prior mortality prediction model for SARS-CoV-2 patients used clinical features but was limited in number of modalities and scale.

    “A notable example is a mortality prediction model in patients infected with SARS-COV-2 that uses clinical features, albeit limited in terms of number of modalities and scale46.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(17): 1663– 1665. 10.1056/NEJMc2005073 32187458 PMC7121177 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nino, G., Zember, J., Sanchez‐Jacob, R., Gutierrez, M. J., Sharma, K., & Linguraru, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Division of Pediatric Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine Children's National Hospital Washington District of Columbia USA
  • Children's National (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics George Washington University School of Medicine Washington District of Columbia USA
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Pediatric Pulmonology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
252-263
ISSN
  • 1099-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-6863
OpenAlex
W3085026028
Cited by
65
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Pulmonology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL141237 and, HL145669)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric COVID-19, lung imaging, chest CT, ground-glass opacities, lung consolidation, bilateral lung lesions, hyperinflation, respiratory viral infections, children
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Lung, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review