Cited by 446COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) CT findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Bao, Cuiping, Liu, Xuehuan, Zhang, Han, Li, Yiming, Liu, Jun·2020·Journal of the American College of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of results from published studies to date to provide a summary of evidence on detection of COVID-19 by chest CT and the expected CT imaging manifestations.Methods Studies were identified by searching PubMed database for articles published between December 2019 and February 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and pooled incidence of CT imaging findings were estimated using a random-effect model.Results A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled positive rate of the CT imaging was 89.76% and 90.35% when only including thin-section chest CT. Typical CT signs were ground glass opacities (83.31%), ground glass opacities with mixed consolidation (58.42%), adjacent pleura thickening (52.46%), interlobular septal thickening (48.46%), and air bronchograms (46.46%). Other CT signs included crazy paving pattern (14.81%), pleural effusion (5.88%), bronchiectasis (5.42%), pericardial effusion (4.55%), and lymphadenopathy (3.38%). The most anatomic distributions were bilateral lung infection (78.2%) and peripheral distribution (76.95%). The incidences were highest in the right lower lobe (87.21%), left lower lobe (81.41%), and bilateral lower lobes (65.22%). The right upper lobe (65.22%), right middle lobe (54.95%), and left upper lobe (69.43%) were also commonly involved. The incidence of bilateral upper lobes was 60.87%. A considerable proportion of patients had three or more lobes involved (70.81%).Conclusions The detection of COVID-19 chest CT imaging is very high among symptomatic individuals at high risk, especially using thin-section chest CT. The most common CT features in patients affected by COVID-19 included ground glass opacities and consolidation involving the bilateral lungs in a peripheral distribution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown are traumatic events that pose threats to psychological well-being.

    “The global pandemic caused by COVID-19 and the subsequent lockdown have been widely recognized as traumatic events that pose threats to psychological well-being.”

    From Beneficial effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction training on the well-being of a female sample during the first total lockdown due to covid-19 pandemic in italy (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction discusses COVID-19 respiratory illness and the role of chest CT, while the Discussion addresses imaging findings; neither addresses psychological well-being. Searches for lockdown, traumatic events, mental health, and psychological stress found no passage supporting the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, C., Liu, X., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Yiming
  • Liu, Jun
Venue
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
701-709
ISSN
1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012931235
Cited by
446
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, chest CT, computed tomography findings, ground-glass opacities, consolidation, thin-section CT, lung lobe distribution, diagnostic accuracy, crazy-paving pattern, interlobular septal thickening, air bronchogram
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Female, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review