The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of continuous B‐cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network
Abstract
B‐cell epitopes play a vital role in the development of peptide vaccines, in diagnosis of diseases, and also for allergy research. Experimental methods used for characterizing epitopes are time consuming and demand large resources. The availability of epitope prediction method(s) can rapidly aid experimenters in simplifying this problem. The standard feed‐forward (FNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) have been used in this study for predicting B‐cell epitopes in an antigenic sequence. The networks have been trained and tested on a clean data set, which consists of 700 non‐redundant B‐cell epitopes obtained from Bcipep database and equal number of non‐epitopes obtained randomly from Swiss‐Prot database. The networks have been trained and tested at different input window length and hidden units. Maximum accuracy has been obtained using recurrent neural network (Jordan network) with a single hidden layer of 35 hidden units for window length of 16. The final network yields an overall prediction accuracy of 65.93% when tested by fivefold cross‐validation. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and positive prediction values are 67.14, 64.71, and 65.61%, respectively. It has been observed that RNN (JE) was more successful than FNN in the prediction of B‐cell epitopes. The length of the peptide is also important in the prediction of B‐cell epitopes from antigenic sequences. The webserver ABCpred is freely available at www.imtech.res.in/raghava/abcpred/. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences.
Hopp, T. P., & Woods, K. R. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6.3824 · Cited by 3,705
The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL
Bairoch, A., & Apweiler, R. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.1.31 · Cited by 3,587
The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 1998
Bairoch, A. (1998) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/26.1.38 · Cited by 3,280
The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000
Bairoch, A. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.45 · Cited by 3,093
A semi‐empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens
Kolaskar, A. S., & Tongaonkar, P. C. (1990) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(90)80535-q · Cited by 1,439
Induction of hepatitis A virus-neutralizing antibody by a virus-specific synthetic peptide
Emini, E. A., Hughes, J. V., Perlow, D. S., & Boger, J. (1985) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.55.3.836-839.1985 · Cited by 1,250
Parker, J. M. R., Guo, D., & Hodges, R. S. (1986) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00367a013 · Cited by 1,185
Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins: A tool for the selection of peptide antigens
Karplus, P. A., & Schulz, G. E. (1985) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01195768 · Cited by 1,149
ProPred: prediction of HLA-DR binding sites
Singh, H., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1236 · Cited by 841
Self-citation
Cited by
Fundamentals and Methods for T- and B-Cell Epitope Prediction
Sanchez-Trincado, J. L., Gomez-Perosanz, M., & Reche, P. A. (2017) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2017/2680160 · Cited by 674
High-throughput prediction of protein antigenicity using protein microarray data
Magnan, C. N., Zeller, M., Kayala, M. A., Vigil, A., Randall, A., Felgner, P. L., & Baldi, P. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq551 · Cited by 531
Improved Method for Linear B-Cell Epitope Prediction Using Antigen’s Primary Sequence
Singh, H., Ansari, H. R., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062216 · Cited by 384
Self-citationTargeted isolation and cultivation of uncultivated bacteria by reverse genomics
Cross, K. L., Campbell, J. H., Balachandran, M., Campbell, A. G., Cooper, C. J., Griffen, A., Heaton, M., Joshi, S., Klingeman, D., Leys, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0260-6 · Cited by 375
An Introduction to B-Cell Epitope Mapping and In Silico Epitope Prediction
Potocnakova, L., Bhide, M., & Pulzova, L. B. (2016) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2016/6760830 · Cited by 367
BepiPred ‐3.0: Improved B‐cell epitope prediction using protein language models
Clifford, J. N., Høie, M. H., Deleuran, S., Peters, B., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4497 · Cited by 296
An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study
Yang, Z., Bogdan, P., & Nazarian, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81749-9 · Cited by 271
Baruah, V., & Bose, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25698 · Cited by 268
Greenbaum, J. A., Andersen, P. H., Blythe, M., Bui, H., Cachau, R. E., Crowe, J., Davies, M., Kolaskar, A. S., Lund, O., Morrison, S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.815 · Cited by 244
Self-citationJespersen, M. C., Mahajan, S., Peters, B., Nielsen, M., & Marcatili, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00298 · Cited by 148
Kazi, A., Chuah, C., Majeed, A. B. A., Leow, C. H., Lim, B. H., & Leow, C. Y. (2018) · Pathogens and Global Health · doi:10.1080/20477724.2018.1446773 · Cited by 122
Artificial Intelligence Technologies for COVID-19 De Novo Drug Design
Floresta, G., Zagni, C., Gentile, D., Patamia, V., & Rescifina, A. (2022) · doi:10.20944/preprints202203.0032.v1 · Cited by 67
Zinsli, L. V., Stierlin, N., Loessner, M. J., & Schmelcher, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.024 · Cited by 63
Identification and validation of novel serum markers for early diagnosis of endometriosis
Gajbhiye, R., Sonawani, A., Khan, S., Suryawanshi, A., Kadam, S., Warty, N., Raut, V., & Khole, V. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der410 · Cited by 53
Sen, D., Gadkari, R. A., Sudha, G., Gabriel, N., Kumar, Y. S., Selot, R., Samuel, R., Rajalingam, S., Ramya, V., Nair, S. C., et al. (2013) · Human Gene Therapy Methods · doi:10.1089/hgtb.2012.195 · Cited by 51
Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping
Grewal, S., Hegde, N., & Yanow, S. K. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463931 · Cited by 35
Qamsari, M. M., Rasooli, I., Chaudhuri, S., Astaneh, S. D. A., & Schryvers, A. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00158 · Cited by 31
Just Keep Rolling?—An Encompassing Review towards Accelerated Vaccine Product Life Cycles
(2023) · doi:10.3390/vaccines11081287 · Cited by 11
Brewpitopes: a pipeline to refine B-cell epitope predictions during public health emergencies
(2023) · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1278534 · Cited by 4
PAbFold: Linear Antibody Epitope Prediction using AlphaFold2
(2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.19.590298 · Cited by 2
Linear antibody epitope prediction using AlphaFold2
DeRoo, J., Terry, J. S., Zhao, N., Stasevich, T. J., Snow, C., & Geiss, B. J. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.98369 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Saha, S., & Raghava, G. P. S.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-48
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2097874743
- Cited by
- 1,747
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
