Cited by 91Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical studies and practicesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

A model qualification method for mechanistic physiological QSP models to support model‐informed drug development

Open access
Friedrich, CM·2016·CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Abstract

Mechanistic physiological modeling is a scientific method that combines available data with scientific knowledge and engineering approaches to facilitate better understanding of biological systems, improve decision‐making, reduce risk, and increase efficiency in drug discovery and development. It is a type of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approach that places drug‐specific properties in the context of disease biology. This tutorial provides a broadly applicable model qualification method (MQM) to ensure that mechanistic physiological models are fit for their intended purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/psp4.12056

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Sorger, P.K. et al Quantitative and systems pharmacology in the post‐genomic era: new approaches to discovering drugs and understanding therapeutic mechanisms. pp 1–48. An NIH white paper by the QSP Workshop Group (NIH, Bethesda, MD, 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedrich, C.
Affiliations
Rosa & Co, LLC San Francisco California USA
Venue
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-26
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
43-53
ISSN
2163-8306 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2255465777
Cited by
87
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
quantitative systems pharmacology, model-informed drug development, model validation, drug development, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Biological, Systems Biology, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review